SECRETS OF THE MEST UNIVERSE part 1,2,3,4,5
Добавлено: 28 дек 2015, 10:28
Online auditing in any place on the planet https://timecops.net/english.html
SECRETS OF THE MEST UNIVERSE
The November Lecture Series of 1952
Posted in support of setting the tech free.
**************************************************
CONTENTS: - SECRETS OF THE MEST UNIVERSE
1. LS-1/3 6 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - THE THETAN AS AN ENERGY UNIT
2. LS-2/3 7 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - FORCE AS HOMO SAPIENS
AND AS THETAN - RESPONSIBILITY
3. LS-4A 14 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - BE, HAVE AND DO, PART I
TIME, SPACE, ENERGY IN RELATION TO DO
4. LS-4B 14 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - BE, HAVE AND DO, PART II
5. LS-5 ? 16 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - SELF-DETERMINISM AND
CREATION OF UNIVERSES
[The 1st 4 previously issued as OT cassettes #11, 12, 13, 15, and 16
- number 13 being LS-3 which is split between the 1st & 2nd of
the SofMU lectures. These have been verified against the old
tapes and the occasional omission has been marked ">". The
last lecture is unverified and may be LPC-6 instead of LS-5 (see
transcript)]
**************************************************
FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
Secrets of the Mest Universe lecture 1.
"Methods of Research - The Thetan as an Energy Unit"
LS-1 plus part of LS-3.
This consists of LS-1 (The November 1952 Lecture Series #1)
which was previously available as #11 in the OT cassettes
which in turn was a direct copy of the reels as done by
the Flag ship in 1974 plus the first side of LS-3 which
was #13 in the OT cassettes. Note that SofMU lecture 2
includes LS-2 which was OT cassette #12 and the rest of
lecture LS-3.
The later SofMU version (and the identical transcript in
R&D volume 12) has edited out some sentences which are
marked ">" in this transcript.
5211C06A LS-1 (60 min)
METHODS OF RESEARCH - THE THETAN AS AN ENERGY UNIT
A lecture given 6 November 1952
I would like to talk to you on this paper, "Standard
Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing" [See this issue in
the Appendix of this volume.] This is the first of Standard
Operating Procedures. Possibly there will be others, but
they will all be referred to with a modification if they
come out. I don't see at the moment much modification in
view. Therefore, it's perfectly safe to make a talk here on
Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing.
Now, a great deal of the data in this will be found in
Scientology 8-80, when that is available to you here. It is
available right this minute, by the way, from the States.
It's a very spectacular little volume. It has... on the
cover of it, it has "Life = EI/-R x -f." That's all it's
got on the cover.
And anyway, a terrific amount of this material is in there,
such as subzero Tone Scale, transfer of energy between
facsimiles and a lot of this and that.
Well now, the origination of Standard Operating Procedure
of Theta Clearing has been done since - oh, a long time
ago - 1932, actually.
And the first study on this subject was electronics.
Electronics of the human mind - were there any? With the
knowledge available at that time, anything that was known
about the electronics of the human mind at that time could
be summed up in one very eloquent word: bunk. There was a
lot of hocus-pocus and presto chango and nonsense.
And yet even at that time the psychiatrists were rushing in
where intelligent beings would fear to tread and were
busily giving people electric shocks and all sorts of
things. There is nothing more wonderful about the MEST
universe than the ability of some within it, and some who
created it, to use everything for the wrong purpose so that
ital wind up wronger. This universe, a few million years
from now, will probably be a solid lump of lead or
something of the sort, because it's tailor-made not to have
anything run right in it.
So in 1932, to look at the rather baffling picture of the
human mind and what was known about the human mind and to
find out that people actually dared, without knowing
anything about it, to avidly use electronics on it was
actually more than could be borne.
I started to work on it. I just started to work it over and
try to find out what - colloquially - cooked. And you
know, I started in thinking that somebody knew something
about it. I really did. I thought something was known -
not about electronics, but about the human mind.
You see, I could easily find what was known about
electronics. It was very easy to find that. James Clerk
Maxwell, Newton - there was a character kicking around in
those days by the name of Einstein; a fellow by the name of
Planck hadn't gotten very busy yet. But Lorentz and
FitzGerald had already done their evil worst with C. The
work that everybody thinks Einstein did was done by
Lorentz, FitzGerald, you see? And the work which Einstein
did, nobody's been able to figure out, but it's, "He did
it." And it's very wonderful. It's resulting, everybody
says, in an atomic bomb, except that the person whose work
the atomic bomb came from was named Planck.
The information about electronics was there, but it was
just about as scrambled when it applies to this sort of
thing as the people to whom it's credited. We find the most
fascinating things about that.
For instance, you had a young chap over here that did the
basic work that made the electronic bomb, or the
thingamabob bomb - it's hardly an atomic bomb. He explored
the orbits and so forth. He has a comet named after him. A
pretty interesting guy.
If I remember rightly, one fellow - The most brilliant
work that was done in this field was done by some fellow -
I don't think he was twenty-one. And the British government
in its "Oh, we won't give a damn about that. That might be
important or somebody might consider it important" sent him
down to Gallipoli and he died on the beach there in the
barbed wire with a gut full of bayonets, with his work
one-third done.
So, anyway, the interesting part of this history was that
nobody seemed to have gotten organized about it. You had
boundless theories. And the second you went into the human
mind, you would have a feeling that somebody knew something
about the human mind. You'd just have this feeling, because
so many people spoke of it with such terrific authority.
You know, they made up in sound volume what they lacked in
information.
And I was particularly amazed, in 1947, to finally find, at
last and long length, that psychoanalysis not only did not
work but made patients worse.
Now, that's how dumb I have been on this. I actually
believed, in 1932 - because I studied Freud; I studied this
under the tutelage of one of his more brilliant pupils, a
Commander Thompson. Commander Thompson was sent there by
the US Navy to study with Freud for a long period of time
and to come back and do something with psychoanalysis with
the US Navy. He was practically the first and only
authority in the United States. There's hardly anybody else
in the United States did more than maybe get a curt
thank-you letter from Sigmund Freud. And they have taken
these very curt thank-you letters and have established
their complete and full reputation since. That and a
Viennese accent.
You see, in the United States, it's a little bit different
than here. You cannot possibly succeed in the field of the
mind if you were to call it the field of the mind or
anything like that - you have to have an accent, and the
phonier the better. You can get these accents; it's easy to
pick up the accent. As a matter of fact, it takes longer to
pick up the accent than it does the information you use.
But once the accent has been picked up, why, you could be a
howling success there. It's very wonderful.
Well, anyway, not wandering off the subject a bit, imagine
my embarrassment - because I'd gone on till 1947 supposing
there was such a thing as a psychotherapy. Well, I had my
off-brand of this sort of thing which was mixed up with
hypnotism and sort of based upon the endocrine reflex...
the endocrine alarm-reaction system of the body, and so on.
There was... I had a therapy worked out. And I just hadn't
paid very much attention to Commander Thompson, I'm afraid,
because what I thought was psychoanalysis is suddenly
discovered by me in 1947 to be a wild, wild distance from
psychoanalysis.
I was proceeding logically in one fashion or another and I
- as far as sexual activity is concerned and that sort of
thing, this was just wonderful. I mean, Thompson had come
back and had said so often that Freud really meant social,
"the social part of man," when he was saying "sexual part
of man" that I just skipped over all that. And an awful big
joke on me: I had never turned around and found, when he
said "libido theory," exactly what he meant. He meant
libido theory. He didn't mean the birds and bees or
anything. He didn't mean anything off-track. He meant sex!
I've read his papers on it. And I read another interesting
paper by that gentleman, by the way, that would fascinate
you and you want to read it some time.
By the way, if you want to pass a psychiatric examination,
just get all of Freud's papers and memorize the dates and
the titles and then go before the American College of
Psychiatry and you can become a psychiatrist. You don't
have to know what's in them. There isn't anything in them
anyway.
But this process is entirely different from what you'd
think it was - entirely different. You wouldn't really have
any conception - knowing what you do now and doing and
working with the tools you're working with now, you
wouldn't realize that you haven't just moved next door.
You've moved over this range of mountains, off of this
planet, into that galaxy and over into another universe.
I'm laying this down with a heavy ax in case anybody ever
asks you to do a translation of Dianetics into terms that a
psychoanalyst can understand.
Don't ever try it, because they're not related subjects.
One is logical and it works, and the other has to do with
sex and it's lots of fun.
Now, that's bitter. But he fooled me. In that particular
regard, I don't like to be fooled.
In some line of work of research - in engineering, you
read a paper and it says that Henry Blitzen has connected
two electrodes with a 220-volt current running there and
has found out that this flow registered so-and-so on a
voltmeter. If you want to go and get a voltmeter and set up
these conditions, you'll find out, sure enough, it
registers so-and-so, thereby showing the resistance of wire
as such and such or something. It'll do it every time. You
can go around to every laboratory in the world where any
electricity is available and rig up this equipment, and the
voltmeter keeps on reading that same reading.
Well, when you speak of a meter, you speak as close to
accuracy as science has been able to come. Einstein's
possible claim to fame will someday be these words: "All an
observer has a right to do is read the meter and report its
exact result - report its reading." That's what an
observer should do. He should not interpret the meter at
any time. And as long as a science hews to that line, you
have reliable information. And if a science can't do that,
don't bother to laugh up your sleeve, guffaw out loud.
Because it's not a science, it is not logical, it is not
organized and it has nothing to do with reality, but is
somebody's happy little jim-dandy, screwball delusion.
Beware a law which is stated at some length and then of
which it is suddenly said, "But of course, there are these
exceptions." Just skip it. The second you see that thing
and it said, "These exceptions append to this law," throw
it in the nearest ashcan and turn around yourself and find
out what the law in the subject really is. Don't expect to
find it in a textbook; you should be able to figure it out.
And if somebody had told me a little more loudly in 1932,
"You have a perfect right to figure out these things
yourself," we would have been a lot further ahead. Because
that's the one thing the MEST universe tells you not to do:
Don't ever figure it out. It's very verboten. And it's a
very, very good thing. Even in the great, honored realms of
science they'll tell you, "Well, of course, we know - heh.
Of course, privately, we don't know what the hell we do
know. But you... You never will know, but you are permitted
to worship... you are permitted to worship before this
great sacred cow." That's actually a primary method.
Now, every once in a while you will find a professor who
sparkles like a diamond and he will rage and tear around
and say, "Well, damn it, figure it out!" Now, there's one
such at MIT. He is the exception rather than the rule.
They call him "Ninety-nine Percent" Johnson. He said, "If
you can ask the question of the universe properly, it is
already ninety-nine percent answered." Now, I'm giving you
here, really, little guide rules for research. These rules
work. There's only one thing you want to know from anybody:
What is the law and what does the meter read? And does the
meter often read otherwise? And the second he says, "Well,
it's kind of like this, but ve, o'er in Vienna - ve have
made a great study of this, and ve have special meters that
read the same all the time. They are painted meters; they
have painted needles on them. And ve have found that the
great, the great successes in the field of psychoanalysis
stem from the fact that these meters always read success.
Now, if you vant to reduce it to science, oh, ve are
scientists." So is the garbage man a scientist. He goes
around picking up odds and ends and throwing them into a
truck, too, without any order. No order, no discipline.
Adler, Jung... Think of it. Think of these guys. Think of
this guy Jung.
He obviously had some brains - obviously did. And what
does he run into?
He runs into past lives. Crush! And now he figures out the
great esoterics of past lives. (Now, we'll all cross
ourselves here!) And the next thing you know, we're all
studying Druidism, and that's all the past life there is
and that's everything that... He must have been stuck on
the track, being dumped in or out of some burned bole of
some tree or something. Or maybe when he was young he was a
blue baby. There's some purpose for this, but that's Jung.
"And Jung has done great vork - don't mistake it." He has
put a lot of printers and engravers - given them a lot of
employment. And right now he keeps a lot of library shelves
from being empty. But it's just fantastic. It's fantastic!
They could get ahold of a datum...
Breuer sat down and found out that if a woman talked long
enough her psychosis went kaboom! He found this out. He saw
it happen.
So instead of just keeping people talking long enough,
Freud gets in there and pitches, and he says, "It's all
sex." He didn't even evaluate what they were talking about.
If he'd just taken a continuous tape record and noted the
exact moment in each case and just let enough people talk
long enough, he would have found out there was a constant.
He would have found out that they got well, more or less,
around the certain points. And if you wanted to treat this
with a scientific method, you actually could have taken
endless tapes and made dictation notes on them and had them
clicking through a time machine as to what they were
talking about and when they got well.
In other words, you kept a record, which is the first
scientific rule: Keep a record! Now, you can keep the
record in your head if you know what you're doing, but keep
a record.
Now, once in a while somebody says to me, "You don't keep a
record of what you're doing." The hell I don't! I keep a
record - this is actually a record.
You would... just wouldn't believe me if I told you there
was practically no thought or research behind this. But
there isn't. There isn't any thought or research, as you
think of it, of taking endless notes, notes, notes and then
trying to find these and compare. That is not the way I do
research. We found some of the basic fundamentals, and you
know practically every word or thought along the track of
figuring out an equation.
And all it is, is a long mathematical equation. It has all
arrived there by deduction and extrapolation from certain
basic facts which were found to be true. And all this is,
is a straight, direct breakdown of the Axioms.
Now, you'd hardly believe that, but that's... that happens
to be true.
This is a breakdown of the Axioms. If you recombine the
Axioms and look them over, you'll find out that it breaks
down to this - it has to be that. It just has to be that,
that's all. You look over the Axioms. These Axioms are
true, and they were sweeping ahead and showing up things.
And all the Axioms were, were the constant data which had
been turned out from the primary principle "Survive," and
the mind as a computing machine which tries to resolve
problems relating to survival. How simple.
But actually what we're doing here is a form of
mathematics. It's a form of mathematics. Now, every once in
a while, just for the hell of it, I put these things into
practice in the material universe. They always work. They
don't work because I say they work.
> You can put these things into the hands of some Chineese
> and send him to Hong Kong and we'll have cleared chinks.
What's the difference? What's the difference, then, between
this investigation which we're doing, on which we're
engaged, and past investigations?
What's the essential difference?
Well, it was one: the assumption that the problem could be
solved. Now, boy, that is an arbitrary assumption. There is
no reason to believe the problem can be solved. But we
throw in the one arbitrary which was thrown in on the track
ahead of survival. There's an arbitrary sitting there, and
that arbitrary says the problem can be solved - the
problem of the human mind can be solved. Now, that should
tell you a lot. You throw an arbitrary ahead of a law in
order to get a law. That's called heuristic thinking.
You postulate something and see if it works. And you... if
it doesn't work you postulate something else.
Get the psychosis of somebody, though, who postulates that
all cats are green and then can't unpostulate it. Is he in
sad shape! He's in terrible condition if he does that. He
said, "The basis of all things are Druidism, are Druidism,
are Druidism" - millions of words on the subject - "are
Druidism, are Druidism." He just got caught in the groove
in his own record and he couldn't unpostulate the
postulate, that's all.
Now, let's look at that as a mechanical proposition, a
therapy that we know about - postulate. This person wasn't
thinking; this person was continuing onward from a
postulate which he could not undo! Having made the
postulate, he was stuck with it! So if you ever do
investigation or observation, for God's sakes, remember
that. Never stick yourself with a postulate and then have a
feeling like you have to make the postulate good just
because you made it. For heaven's sakes, have enough
humility once in a while to say, "What do you know, I was
wrong!"
> Throw it in the wastebaske... [gap]
But they're natural laws. Let's divorce this thing
from Hubbard's ideas or opinions. You know, when I tell you
that everything that has been done on this exact line is
written down and is known to you, I speak to you the truth.
The only missing data there would be - the things I had
thought of and threw away. I didn't even bother to keep
notebooks on them. And somebody says, "That's a gap, then,
in the research line." The heck it is! The heck it is. You
can take these and get about eighty-five billion times more
data than I threw away! And I didn't throw away any
valuable data. The stuff was junk! I did an experiment one
time - "the great god Throgmagog." I invented him one
morning. I said, "By golly, I bet you he's got some
therapeutic use. I wonder what this conscious mind is? What
is this conscious mind?" So I said, "Let's see, you ought
to be able to hypnotize somebody..." Used an awful lot of
hypnotism in early research. God bless Charcot; that's all
I got to say.
And God bless Anton Mesmer.
All right. These boys I was working with here and there
were usually very good hypnotic subjects. Once in a while
I'd pick up an awfully bad hypnotic subject just to find
out what made him tick, why he was so terrible as an
hypnotic subject, because hypnotism was a wild variable.
In science, in good investigation, look for the wild
variable. Look for that thing which is wild, which isn't
acting right, which acts this way, this way and that way,
that way. And there is where your use comes in of the
natural law which has a thousand exceptions.
You say, "Boy, you mean somebody knows a datum which
doesn't operate right? And there are exceptions to it?
Well, gee, that thing is probably the clue to the biggest,
doggonedest puzzle! We can even go and look and find out
what that puzzle is!" There must be a puzzle there if
you've got an erratic behavior. And if we can't break it
down on what we know about the mind, we probably have
opened the chapter of a whole new... a whole new study any
time that happens. So remember this about wild variables.
Well, anyway, I invented this great god Throgmagog for one
single and solitary purpose: to find out if the conscious
mind could be removed from the individual and be made to
think and give orders to the individual thereafter.
Did that in 1947. Nineteen forty-seven, the first few
months, I'd actually gone and gotten the actual books of
psychoanalysis of Jung, Adler and the rest of the boys, and
I'd given them a good hard run. I burned the midnight oil
on these things - burned it hard - because I was doing a
review of what I thought they were doing. And I found out
that I had steered a course over the hills and far away. I
found out that Breuer's knowledge of hypnotism was very
elementary, that I'd thrown an awful lot of data onto the
track which had been picked up elsewhere and then said,
"Well, that belongs too, then." And that is not the case.
So it became almost anything but the case.
All right. Breuer's work indicated, however, people could
be hypnotized and it had some connection with
psychotherapy. That's an important datum.
If he'd stuck with that - be famous forever.
All right. Here we had the ability to put a person out and
do something about his mind. What can we do about his mind?
So I invent the great god Throgmagog, I say, "All right,"
to this fellow, "you are now the great god Throgmagog, and
you will now step two feet to the right of yourself and you
will thereafter do thinking and computing and give you all
the advice which you need on the subject. Five, four,
three, two, one, snap! Wake up." The great god Throgmagog.
And the guy would go around for days doing brilliant
things, the like of which you never heard of. Just
brilliant things. It's something like doing long division
of fifteen numbers divided into twenty-one hundred numbers,
or something like that, with right answers - calculating
machine problems, and all that sort of thing. How would he
do these things?
He would turn around and he would say, "The problem is
so-and-so and so-and-so. The answer is so-and-so and
so-and-so." The great god Throgmagog.
My idea was that somehow or other you could remove the mind
from the influence of the reactive mind, which I'd already
spotted. And if you could do this, you would have an
unlimited, unaberrated self.
And what was I doing? It takes five years to find out what
I was doing! Otherwise, that's just another experiment.
That's one of the fastest ways to Theta Clear I know.
Except don't tell the guy he's also inside. Tell him to get
out and stay out, and to monitor this thing from a
distance, and you got a Theta Clear. And it gives you a
whole new method of Theta Clearing right there.
Svengali. You're talking about hypnotism and so on - boom
him out. Put him under deep trance and knock him out of his
head if you can't do anything else. Shoot him full of
narcosynthesis and kick him out. Possibly you could do a
thousand things like this, but our later results tell us
one thing else: he must get out in a highly self-determined
state or he'll cave in. And the great god Throgmagog always
caved in, in almost exactly two weeks. The self-determinism
punch would last... its highest level would be reached in
three days, then would lower and would be gone in a few
weeks. Interesting, isn't it? Five years ago - the great
god Throgmagog.
But investigation is something you do by proceeding from
something which gave results and to which you can find no
exceptions. And let me give you the other little clue to
this is, look for exceptions - to hell with the proofs!
You can prove anything. But find exceptions to what you've
just thought of.
Take objection to what you've just done. Believe it utterly
while you're doing it, and then turn around and reject it
completely and say there are exceptions to this thing.
Do you know how long the word survival was under
investigation for exceptions? It was under investigation
for exceptions for five years. For five years I refused to
believe that survival had any basis to man. And I kept
trying to find something that wouldn't equate into the word
survival. And I couldn't find anything for five years, and
that's a long time to look.
Now, that should tell you a great deal about auditing.
Now, in the process of auditing, what you are doing is
using a series of discoveries which were found by
extrapolation, logical extrapolation. They were not found
by amassing enormous amounts of data. Inductive logic was
the basis of this research, and the invention of a
mathematics of logic which is not dissimilar to symbolic
logic made it possible to add up facts, associate facts.
But first one had to know that mathematics was a
theoretical thing and that to apply it to the real universe
you had to recognize it as a theoretical thing and be
perfectly willing to associate similarities, even though
vague, rather than x's are always x's and c's are always c's.
Now, you as an auditor start in on a case, you're using a
whole lot of these laws. You're using a lot of them.
They're there; they're there for you to investigate. There
are two reasons why they might not be there for you: is,
one, you are stuck on one of your own postulates; another,
that you are indoctrinated to such depth that you couldn't
escape it; another is that you have some sort of a fear or
mores or something of the sort which you mustn't overthrow;
and another one would be they're not true, that would be
the other one.
So the way to investigate them, evidently, would be in this
wise: it would be to take those first few conditions there
and apply them and find out if there's some reason - if
this thing doesn't seem to be working for you - why you
don't want it to work. That's always a good thing to ask
yourself.
Now, what would be your arbitrary with every preclear?
Because when we look at a preclear, we are looking at the
whole universe of Scientology.
What arbitrary do we have to postulate the moment we look
at a preclear?
We follow the same course, actually, as the investigation
itself. We have to postulate his case can be resolved. And,
by George, you'd better postulate it.
The next one is, is "Do I want to resolve his case?" And if
you don't want to resolve his case, don't! But don't say to
yourself, "I ought to be able to want to resolve his case."
You won't travel on it. Just ask yourself. This would scare
into view this fact: "Heck no. I think that women ought to
be aberrated," or "Heck no, I think men really ought to be
(something or other)," or "I think old men ought to be
under the thumb. They're dangerous." If you fail to ask
yourself - fail to make such a postulate or find out why
you can't make such a postulate about a case - you'll do
the darnedest things sometimes, quite to your own surprise,
your own amazement.
Why, every time you start to audit this preclear you keep
changing your mind and giving him the wrong signals. You're
operating on a postulate. Your postulates are only as
valuable as you value them or as they are workable.
So in auditing we're following very much the same course as
was followed in research. A very strange fact, but the
research line of this is quite consistent and hews the line
very closely, and the manifestations which you find are
rather standard.
Now, the higher common denominator we have reached today
actually is so easy to generalize with that you can apply
it to practically any case you meet with great ease.
Let's start out with the first one. This fellow could be
called - incorrectly, on a little lower echelon - an
energy unit located inside his head.
That's pretty correct, pretty correct. You'll find
occasionally, though, a preclear is big enough and
relatively unaberrated, and he's a big thetan. He thinks of
himself as being a big guy. And when he steps out he's a
big guy.
He's not just that big. He's maybe much bigger than his body.
Fantastic. If you found somebody who was in pretty good
shape, that would be his concept of himself. After you've
worked for a little while, your concept of yourself ought
to get bigger, and you ought to feel yourself as pretty big.
All right. We know that. Now let's define that unit just a
little better.
Let's define the unit in terms of capabilities rather than
in terms of MEST universe dimensions. This unit is capable
of locating in space and time, matter and energy;
converting, conserving, altering in many ways, starting and
stopping matter and energy in space and time, and - what
do you know - is also capable of inventing space and time,
and is probably capable of inventing so many more things
than space and time that space and time look like a little
schoolboy's game.
Don't underestimate what this thing can do because along
that line lies the advance in processing, is what can we
find that everybody can do? What could we find?
Could he postulate, for instance...? Let's just take
postulate and the proposition: Could you have your preclear
suddenly say to himself, "I am in the year booz-wooz. And
the year booz-wooz contains a signboard, and that's all."
And he could all of a sudden... It'd be some trick like
this, so don't inhibit yourself in the tricks. Don't
inhibit yourself, because the thing you're working with is
completely uninhibited, which has been inhibited by
becoming to believe it ought to be inhibited! Wonderful
trick, you see?
Now, if you could discover something that this thing could
do that was in advance or different than space and time,
which native ability - native ability, infinity ability -
which ability had never been inhibited, you'd have an
instantaneous Theta Clear.
You see how that could work? I mean, if you could find
something that was beyond space, time, matter and energy,
which he could do that he could transfer over to, why, it
would be with the greatest of ease that he could suddenly
handle all this.
A thousand routes are open - a thousand, thousand,
thousand routes are open to you to a faster process than
Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing.
But this is a basic route. We know this works. We know this
works. This even works on rough cases if you work with them
for a while.
Now, we know a lot of the reasons and a lot of the bugs you
have to get out of the case in order to make this work. But
just because I tell you, "This is Standard Operating
Procedure" and just because as a good auditor you ought to
know this thing colder than any turkey ever got, this isn't
all the therapy there is. Because with this we have
discovered a strange fact: It can locate matter and energy
in space and time. It can also locate, invent, change,
convert, conserve and upset time and space itself, and then
locate matter and energy in it. Oh, boy! Sky's the limit.
If this confounded thing can do that, it isn't even vaguely
limited by the MEST universe - not even vaguely limited by
the MEST universe nor by its own universes nor by the
concept of universes. Lord knows what it can do! And
probably nobody has ever realized that himself. But the
least that it can do is be so completely original,
theoretically, that what it was original about would bear
no relationship to the MEST universe.
An artist starts out with this capability and spins in
quick, because everybody is at great pains to tell him at
every turn that he can't think of anything original, it's
all been thought of before. This is the swan song and the
end of every career as an artist: "It's all been thought of
before." The hell it has! I have written stories that
hadn't been thought of before, but I never published them.
And the reason why is they would have to have been thought
of - to be a publishable, acceptable communication line,
they have to contain elements which have been thought of
before. But you're trying to communicate with the story,
and that's something else. So let's not get stuck on this
and get all identified on this basis. So you see how simple
that is?
Yes, I have written stories which are completely original
and utterly unintelligible to anybody else - completely
unintelligible, no communication at all. They weren't even
written. They were really original. And of course then you
say, "What were they?" Right away I would have to translate
them into terms which were common-denominator terms. The
second I did that I would have to change the story so that
it had been thought of before, so that the person to whom
you're communicating could receive it in the language. And
the fact that they're told in language says all these words
have been thought of before.
So you see, what a far cry it is from the fact of
originality to communicating what you think.
Now, let's look at the basic condition of our thetan and
let's follow, very rapidly here, right straight through
what he probably does. He's sitting there and he's part of
(quote) "the main body of theta," and for some reason or
other he starts setting up his own universe. We're not
quite sure why. Maybe there is no reason. Maybe he just
sets up his own universe. Maybe he got set up and then he
set up his own universe. Lord knows what. And the universe
which he set up was set up with an unlimited - no
arbitraries, except those which he imposed upon it himself
and well knew that he imposed upon it. So he set up this
universe.
And now let's get differences of universes. One preclear
has set up a universe that doesn't have any time in it. He
just set it up with a big space and it hasn't got any time
in it. So it's got no motion and no energy in it.
Perfectly legitimate. Just because matter here is in motion
is no reason why you've got to have only matter which is in
motion. The only reason we have matter here that's in
motion is because it's the easiest way to make matter.
That's something like, well, the reason guys work is it's
the harder way of doing something easy. One of those
things; no sense to it.
All right. Now, let's say this other universe, it's a
complete universe except maybe it didn't have any green in
it. That was its sole lacking factor.
All right. Let's take another preclear, and we'll find out
that his basic universe didn't have any pain in it. He
never saw any necessity to put any pain in it because he
didn't have any force in it. There was no force in this
universe, but there was motion. But there wasn't any force.
But one obtained motion simply by changing forms. And he
didn't see any reason to have any substance to the forms.
And if he had no reason to have any substance to the forms,
he had no reason to have any force, so there was naturally
no pain.
And he depended, let us say, upon the people he peopled his
universe with, if he peopled them at all - that's a
specialized idea, you see - if he peopled this universe
with a lot of people, why, he probably kept them interested
in life simply with a lot of high-band ideas. Didn't have
anything to do with pain.
He'd set down a moral code and he'd say... that said
so-and-so and so-and-so, and it said, "People that do not
dance are immoral." That was all there was to it. And then
people would come around and ask him, "What's immoral?" And
he'd say, "Oooh!" That was all there was to it. Universe
ran like a top. Nothing wrong with this universe.
All right. There's hardly anybody set up a universe with
this damn thing called sound. Let me tell you something
about sound. Sound is only necessary because it's a
360-degree perceptic. And it's a good warning of danger. So
it automatically takes a universe with a lot of danger in
it to be a universe that has to contain sound. Now, you
follow that, don't you? It has to be a dangerous universe
or sound would have no value.
All right. We take a universe with no sound in it - very
interesting; how would you communicate? Well, all right,
let's communicate with light beams.
Let's don't just interchange ideas or flows or something of
the sort; let's have communication in that universe, only
let's have light beams and people imagine a screen and
imagine the light on the screen and the light plays back
and forth across the screen and that communicates ideas.
But, gee, do you know what that means? That means the
people of that universe would have to have the power of
creating energy! Oh, and to a craven, cowardly, sort of a
stupid - not even a craven, cowardly fellow, but just a
dull, stupid kind of a fellow, like the kind of a fellow
that'd create the MEST universe - that would be
unthinkable! Because that's probably his highest trick.
Now, you've known some magician who would have some trick.
He's a parlor magician and he has a deck of cards, and they
are very, very greasy, old, thumbed cards. And he comes in
and he says, "Take a card." And you take a card and you
look at it carefully and he says, "You got it?" And you
say, "Yup." Now, he cuts the deck very carefully, looks at
that card and he says, "Now put it back on the pile." You
put it back on the pile, and he puts this other on top of
it. "Now," he says, "I'll tell you what card you took." And
he finally brings it out and he says, "There!" Now, if you
were to... you yourself had a little skill in this and... Gee.
Boy, would he be upset if you took that deck of cards and
did a pass with them and said, "Well, have a card." He
takes a card, you do a pass, put it back on the pile, and
you flip them over and say, "There's your card." Or let him
shuffle them, or anything. He'd say it couldn't be done -
obviously it couldn't be done. He'd be a pretty dumb
magician, truth be told. He probably would not have a
capability of appreciating a higher level of magic if he
thought this trick of one card was so damn valuable.
Well, that's kind of like the MEST universe. The guy who
thought this one up, thought this one up this wise: "Let's
see, I can't think up anything but this one thing - that's
force. Force. I've got a pretty good idea that there are
other universes around, and if this force suddenly goes
through my time and I keep changing the time of the force,
it'll pick up all these other universes and blow these good
ideas into this universe, because every time this force
connects with any universe, of course it'll explode it or
something." He'd think of this one trick, this one stupid
trick that anybody could think of, you see. Force. That's
the easy one. That's the easiest idea to think of.
Now, it could be that it's just sort of the common
denominator of universes when they collided. Maybe
everybody had his own universe and it all collided.
But you know where it left you? If you had a universe and
you were sitting there - it might have been a universe
without color; it was usually a universe without sound -
sometimes it was. You had various things about this universe.
And all of a sudden, one day, you were sitting there in
your own universe and it went kapow! Gee, it'd startle you.
And it would probably contain sound and electrical explosion.
And that's the common denominator of fear: force wave with
sound. If you want to scare anybody, use a force wave with
sound and you've got it.
People are very troubled about sound - much more troubled
than they are about light. That tells them they couldn't
handle sound. So maybe they held on to this and they
decided they'd study what this blast was. And they might be
holding on to it ever since. They might be trying to
protect their own universe from the blast. The last
fleeting moment of "It was all theirs," and they never got
the moment of transition. And then they thought the blast
had changed their universe around; they were in another
universe.
You see where that mix-up would come on the track, the kind
of a mix-up it'd be? Possibly you will find this as one of
the most aberrative factors in your preclear. I don't know.
But we play around with home universe in the preclears and
so forth.
The evolution of beingness is at this moment a bit of a
mystery. When we know more about the evolution of
beingness, we will have easier cases.
So, when it all boils down to the history of the track, we
could be a little more romantic and involved about it and
say here was a fellow and he had a... he was going around
and he had these little illusions and he was building up a
universe with these illusions and he was perfectly happy,
cheerful about the thing. And one day he decided to show
these illusions to another fellow he ran into, sort of time
and space coincidence. And he ran into this other fellow
and he said, "What do you know, there's another being
around here," and he showed him one of these illusions. And
the other fellow said, "That's nothing. Look at this." And
so they sat down and had a nice contest.
They decided who could build the nicest something or other,
and you had a dichotomy starting to work.
And they built this and they built that, and finally one of
them got kind of upset with the other one and invented an
illusion which blew up the other guy's illusions. Could be,
you see.
There's an illusion band on the track that you almost drive
a preclear mad processing, because it's "Die yesterday."
Fellow blows up your illusions, so you say, "You're dead
yesterday," and he's dead yesterday, and therefore your
illusions are right there. That'd be kind of scrambled,
wouldn't it? Fellow would have a tendency to agree on
something else.
All right. However that may be, whatever this illusion is,
if the MEST universe is an inevitable average of all
universes, which it might well be, it nevertheless moved in
on your preclear's universe. And possibly the track starts
with a motivator and not a DED. Maybe he's still holding on
to it. And maybe that's your occasional very occluded case.
Your occasional very occluded case might be holding on to
the explosion which blew up his own universe. It's a cinch
he's holding on to some explosion, because he won't let go.
Now, why don't you run this on such an occluded case just
as an experiment: "I'll study it. I'll look it over. I'll
study it. I won't study it; I will study it; I won't study
it," and find out what you got. Just take a gunshot at it.
And my bet is that you'll give him some nasty somatics.
Because, you see, he had to start out with the premise "I
didn't know," because here you find him not knowing. And
you have to have him stuck in some kind of an incident
where he doesn't know, because he doesn't know.
Here's this fellow who has done the astonishing trick of
forgetting how to create time and space. Well, that is
silly. There is nothing sillier. Would you think... Here
were all the thetans who could create time and space, and
all of a sudden here's a thetan that can't create time and
space anymore.
That is something like... just as astonishing as here's a
little five-year old boy and he's always liked ice cream,
and one day he forgets there is such a thing as ice cream.
You go up to him and you say, "Would you like an ice cream
cone, Johnny?" And he says, "What's that?" And you say,
"Well, just like the ice cream cone I gave you yesterday!"
You'd say, "Gee, the poor kid! What's the matter with this
guy?" Well, that's about the suddenness and the stupidity
level of change of a thetan who can create time and space,
and all of a sudden all he can do is hang on to a body and
obey orders and think of something once in a while.
Pathetic when you come to think about it. But it really
isn't pathetic at all. What are you doing falling for all
this stuff about pain? What do you want pain for? It's not
even useful. It's not useful to you, it's not useful to
anybody else. If you want to have destruction, why put in
pain? Because it's a strange thing that pain would be 1.8
- evidently not 1.81 or 1.82 or 1.73 on the Tone Scale;
it's 1.8. And it is composed of hotness, coldness and an
electrical current. See, that's the anatomy and location of
pain, and it is caused by an excess of randomity which is
at a certain wave level. Pain isn't a helter-skelter
hit-or-miss, just an impact. Pain is a very, very precise
thing.
It's, oh, fascinating - a very precise thing. 1.8 on the
Tone Scale. And it's caused by just so much. Because, you
see, if you give the guy just a little bit more randomity
than that, he doesn't feel pain - he's gone right now.
He's just gone.
And that's another thing, is how does your preclear ever
get the idea that he can be gone? How can you have a
goneness out of a unit which can do time and space and
energy and matter, and all sorts of things? How do you get
a goneness? How can he be gone? There isn't any place to
which he could "went." Or how can he be unconscious? He's
capable of inventing consciousness.
What's he doing going unconscious? Well, all the answers to
these questions are right there in - possibly in
agreement: If you'll feel pain, I'll feel pain.
Only I never agreed with anybody to feel pain.
Now, he deals with and experiences best illusions of his
own. That's his highest level of knowingness. Next best, he
experiences reality, and next best to that experiences
delusion. That's your gradient scale of knowingness. If
they ever added up, they would be "know illusion," and then
junior to that would be "know MEST, and junior to that
would be "know delusion." You could probably get a lot of
ideas out of delusion, but it's unimportant.
Now, all these things are, to some tiny or vague degree
here in the MEST universe, energy. And they locate and are
in time and space. But I won't say whose time and space. A
delusion is somebody pushing his illusion into your time
and space - if you want to define it that way.
All right. Enough discussion on this. We have, then, a plot
of a track which will pretty well work out on an E-Meter
with your preclear. And if you want to look over the track
and the E-Meter and the preclear, you'll find out that he
has some kind of a history like I just described to you -
home universe, he calls it.
There's separation from theta, you get a bop - home
universe - or you get a little rise and everything was
very fine. And then all of a sudden, there was the MEST
universe - the home universe was gone. And you'll get him
thinking, "Oh, my, my. I wonder if I - I wish I... wish I
knew what the secret of the MEST universe was." There isn't
any secret to the MEST universe: that was its secret. The
secret of the MEST universe is you can create a MEST
universe any time you want to. But if you held on to and
tried to grab hold of and stop the encroachment of the MEST
universe, not just change your wavelength - if it happened
in your time-space suddenly enough - you're here. And if
you let it go on by and to hell with it and just shifted
over in another time span, you've got your own universe
someplace else and you're not here. The essence, the very
essence of simplicity.
Those are two classifications: there's them that's here and
them that's not here. And them that's not here we're not
going to worry about, because the funny part of them that's
not here, they're probably having a perfectly happy time
someplace else in time, space, and maybe a time-space unit
which runs diagonally across this room, by the way. I mean,
you see, it has no bearing - time relationships, space
relationships.
There is no space or time beyond the space or time
necessary to hold the energy which you create. But if you
have the ener --. You get the idea.
What's so baffling about it, and the only thing that's
really baffling about it, is you can create the whole kit
and caboodle out of your thin... out of thin nothing. You
can create the whole thing - there you are, there is no
secret. That would be the hardest thing that you could ever
convince anybody, but that's a typical MEST universe fact.
There's no secret. What's the secret of the MEST universe?
That there's no secret, of course! That would be right
there in the groove with the MEST universe, that would be
the MEST universe's best trick. It makes the obvious and
hides it, because it's a crude, relatively unworkable,
solid, rather onerous sort of a dopehead's dream, who
wasn't too bright.
And if it's the inevitable average, brother, I don't think
much of some of the other universes that collided to make
this one. Because it's dopey, this one. It's not a bright
universe.
Its total value - evaluation is force. It's all down on the
force band. And that's silly! Because something that's on
the force band won't work! The one thing that won't work is
force! Under no circumstances has force ever worked! An
idea any day of the week can lick the pants off of force.
[tape LS-1, OT cassette #11 ends here abruptly]
------------------------ start of LS-3
[The remainder of the lecture as delivered in SofMU and
R&D 12 is side 1 of lecture LS-3 "Have as Homo Sapiens and as
Thetans, Clearing by Communication, Have" which is OT
Cassette #13 supposedly given on 7 Nov 52 rather than
on 6 Nov 52 which is the date of the above lecture]
All these great, flaming suns, all these huge, inimitable
expanses, all these tremendously, tremendously cold and
inhospitable spaces, all these dead planets and dead stars,
could be reduced to a pile of utter nothingness of rubble
by an idea.
You don't believe it? Well, you don't believe it. And the
only thing I can ask you to do is make a clinical
experiment on it. Try it. Try it in a small, little sphere
- a little sphere of action. Take somebody you know who
believes in tremendous force and think of the insignificant
idea which would defeat him utterly.
You actually have to be able and willing to handle force.
But how do you handle force? With force? No! You can't
handle force with force because that gives you ridges and
more force. You see how that is? You can't handle force
with force. It isn't that force begets force, or he who
dies by the sword lives by the Bible, or anything. I mean,
whatever it is... I'm not scrambling that up on purpose,
really. That was just a slip of the Testament! Here's...
And, by the way, it is, to a large extent, a book of force,
which is where it falls down. And the only time religion
has ever fallen down was when it believed it had a god of
force. A god of force can always be licked.
You can take the mightiest cyclotrons in the world that
exist today, and if you just get the proper idea they will
become dust. Force has to be handled, maybe, by force, but
the actual fact is that an idea alone can vanquish force.
If you just had .if you had a command and control over
space and time the way you should have, you could simply
pshew! onto another time track any force that ever came
near you.
Now, let's put this very practically - very practically:
The cat Tom is eating the little mouse... about to eat the
little mouse Jerry in the comic cartoon. And Tom is sitting
there and he's about to stuff Jerry into his mouth when all
of a sudden - Jerry is sitting on his hand - and Jerry
looks in this palm and then, and he won't let Tom see
what's in his hand. The big, stupid cat says, "What you
got?" And Jerry says, "Pshew!" and is gone.
Yeah, what you got? It doesn't take any idea at all... The
only reason why you ever have trouble - if you ever do
have trouble - defeating force is because you just don't
think of the idea, and usually because you overreach with
your idea. You haven't any concept of how simple the idea
has to be! You want to get complicated because you know
it's lots of force, so you think you want to have lots of
idea.
This is not order of magnitude; they don't follow the same
order of magnitude. Actually, they go quite in reverse.
They go quite in reverse: is the more force there is, the
less idea it takes to handle that force. Because an idea is
awful powerful. And you can get an idea so powerful that
it'll just shoot above, around and over and through this
mass and this force, and it just never hits it.
So remember that in processing a preclear. Your idea can be
way, way, way too good to defeat this thing which is
practically... which is nothing to handle this force. All
you are trying to get him to do is handle force, create and
destroy force, which includes create and destroy matter,
energy, space and time.
Well, now, if you try to use these big, complex ideas, and
you erect these treadmills, and then you have to have the
weathercock so the weather is in the northwest section, and
then you've got to have this and you've got to have that,
and you do this and you do that, and something or other,
and then you make long lists of this, and then you have him
running around the living room, and then we'll put up a
wire cage around him while he's processing so none of his
force escapes or something, so no other force can hit him
and...
Thha. All you had to say with him is just, "Step a foot
back of your head." That was all the idea it took.
All of a sudden he gets a new idea. You want to know what
happens? He doesn't change in location in time and space.
He just gets a new idea and he's the idea! He has that
capability. You're not transferring a thing. And that's the
first mistake you can make, is thinking that you are
transferring and handling a thing. You're not. It's not an
object made out of force and matter.
You're handling something which is so much more powerful
than the atom bomb and so much more changeable than a
woman's mind that there's just no comparison. You're
handling this thing of terrific capability and it handles
so easy. And all you're asking it to do is to do the
easiest thing there is to do - that's handle force.
Now, if you don't believe force is easy to handle, you
say... Think of it this way: You've got to space the force
in terms of time. If you try to handle a force in too short
a space of time by a force, it'll really finish you.
Here's a guy with a rifle. All right. He walks up, he's
going to shoot you with a rifle. Well, you've waited until
he's walked up to you. And what are you doing with a body,
anyhow? Well, the thing to do as he walks up to you with a
rifle - all you have to do is whisper in his ear, "The
breech will explode." He won't pull the trigger. He gets
the sudden idea the breech is going to explode.
What are you doing with a body, anyhow? You get a body, you
see, and you have a good time with this body, and you say,
"Well, it takes a body to handle force." Yes, it takes a
body to stop force. That's perfectly true, and it's a lousy
idea. It's a terrible idea, actually. Why aren't you in the
kind of a state that all you have to do is mock up a body
which everybody can see and know is there? That's all.
And somebody comes up with force and they say, "We're going
to destroy your body!" That's shorthand for "We're going to
arrest you," or "We're going to hit you," or "We're going
to use force on you," "We're going to take time and space
away from you; going to impose time and space on you,"
something of the sort like this.
And they reach out and they say, "Come along with..."
There's nothing there.
You can stand there and say, "What's the matter wit' ya,
bud?" Because that's really the first and only mistake you
ever made on the time track is you tried to stop force with
force. And the second you tried to stop force with force,
it left you in a condition of being handled by force from
there on. And right now you think it takes force to handle
force. There isn't any reason why you couldn't wish that up
in the air instead of having to toss it up in the air. Just
wish it up in the air and have it hang there. There isn't
any reason why you can't do this.
But don't tell me that you're going to do this while you're
still in a body, you still have to have a body, you still
have to have for yourself this rare and fantastic privilege
of being... Well, they permitted you to feed a body and
work a body and earn a living for the body, and so on, on
the theory' that you have to have a body.
All right. Let's take the theory "You have to have a body,"
and what comes out of it instantly? "All right. I'll have a
body." It doesn't have to be a force body, though.
Your thirst for making things automatic, of setting up
ridges that would operate ridges so you wouldn't have to
concentrate on them at all or give them new ideas all the
time, brought you into a condition of a reliance upon the
body.
You say, "The body can handle force. I can't handle force."
That's the same statement. When you say, "Joe will always
dig the ditch and Bill will always fill out the forms,"
you're saying at the same time, whether you realize it or
not, "I need to have the ditch dug by a force body, and the
force body which I'll use to do this is Joe. And the forms
that'll be filled out will be done by... they have to be
filled out by a force body." Why don't you just dream up
the form, huh? You dream up a filled-up form. Somebody asks
you to make out a form. What the hell would you be doing
making out forms if you didn't have a body? It would just
be a body that'd - you know, ration books, petrol books,
this book, that book; you wouldn't need those.
All right. Let's take money: Now, there isn't any reason
why you can't think up a ten-pound note and hand it to the
fellow and have it go on into circulation for the next ten
years. There's no reason why you can't do this.
What do you want a money for, huh? You say, "It's nice to
have." That means MEST is nice to have. Great! You've
confessed right at that moment you can't invent MEST.
You've said, "I can't create MEST. I have to acquire it or
steal it. I have to go through this legal tender
proposition in order to acquire some other MEST somebody
else has got." Interesting, isn't it?
When you get into the field of force, we get into the field
of complete inability - just utter, degrading inability.
And that's something that you've got to cure with your
preclear. What's all this inability?
I had a fellow one time, invented the term abstricts. I was
talking to him for three days, a year or two ago, about
"The only thing that you have ever been granted is an
inhibition. The only present which has ever been made to
you is an inhibition - the ability not to do something.
That's the only thing anybody ever gave you, is the ability
not to do. Nobody ever gave you the ability to do." The
ability not to do. Because notice, most of the time when
somebody gives you the ability to do, they have to tell
you, you can't do it first; then they proceed to teach you.
All right. The ability not to do becomes very interesting.
And he formed it up and he began to listen to people when
they talked. And they said, "You can't do this and you
can't do that." Nearly everything they said to him out in
this human society was "You can't do it. You mustn't do it.
There is a barrier there. There's a barrier here." And he'd
listen to this.
And that's a good drill for you, by the way. Open up your
ears for the next day or so and just listen to Homo sapiens
talking, and you'll find out that he's telling you "There's
a barrier in time. There's a barrier in space.
You can't move here. You can't move there. You can't do
this. You can't do that." He's a walking mass of "can't,"
because that's all he was ever given was "can't." Because
nobody could give him "can." He could! He could already,
you see? Horrible joke, isn't it?
Well, this young fellow invented the word abstrict, and
that meant "restrictions..." - oh, "the abstraction of
restriction." An abstraction of restriction was a method of
creating space and time. And you're right, you see?
I mean, that's very correct. And if you create space and
time you have this condition. All right. Abstricts.
You listen to Homo sapiens the next day or so. He's saying,
"You can't do this, and I can't do that, and you can't do
this, and we can't do that, and this is impossible, and
that is unobtainable, and this cannot be reached," and
that's all he talks about. If he ever says "can," he says,
"Well, we can do it if we are allowed." He always adds in
that he has to be permitted. This fellow got this concept,
by the way... And if you don't think this is a powerful
concept, listen to what happened to him.
He was in love with a girl. He went over, he taught her the
principle.
She'd not been happy with her husband and she had a little
baby. He went over and taught this to this girl, and they
turned around and they told the husband to go fly a kite.
And they went up the pole, so to speak, both of them.
And you say, "Well, nothing good could have come of this.
Nothing good could have come of it." But he promptly got a
job for about twelve hundred dollars a month as a
mathematician. He'd never quite been able to make the grade
before. And he got a job with one of the big aviation
companies because he solved two of the most imponderable
imponderables in the field of aviation, one after the
other, and took it down one morning and threw it on the
desk of the works manager and said, "There is a solution to
this, there is a solution to that. And I want a job because
I keep turning things out like this all the time." And they
gave him a job. And he got the kind of a job so he never
has to report to work.
That's an abstrict. And it is very powerful.
If you want to send your preclear up the pole fast, you
just convince him that there is no limit and there is no
barrier. Now, he's liable not... You see, if you've got the
knowledge of what limits and barriers there have been and
then you get this other concept, you're perfectly safe. You
just move on out of it. But if you get this concept that
there are no barriers, and you all of a sudden vaguely
understand the concept or something clicks on the subject
and you have no understanding of it, there's no track, you
don't know the composition of the MEST universe or an
illusion or anything else, you just simply soar - boom!
And then six months later, people are picking up the pieces.
Fascinating the limitations, limitations.
For instance, Kipling's great poem "If" tells you what to
do, and every line of it is an inhibition. It infers that
this isn't natural. It infers that this is just horrendous,
this is magniloquent. If you were this way that would be
terrific, and usually you can't quite obtain that, but
there it is and this is the big goal. And he makes this big
hurrah, hurrah, crunch! I like his poetry a lot, but he
does this hurrah on this "If." And I notice that the
lousiest poem he ever did, really, was "If" because it
says, "Look, look-a-here, if you could do all these things,
if you could do all these things," and so on, and he paints
this little tiny molehill, see? Here's this little tiny
molehill, and he says, "Boy, if you could climb that, you'd
really be a man, my son." And the guy said, "God, I must be
low. Gee, look where I must be, if to climb this molehill
makes me up high." You get the idea? That's the sort of
backwards computation you run into consistently.
Now, all of these things - all of these things are
actually the gilt around Standard Operating Procedure.
What's an engram? Boom with force. What's it do? It makes
the guy meet it with force. How do you solve it? You stop
the guy from meeting it with force. It's awful simple,
isn't it?
And force is energy, space and time. So there are eighty
ways you could go about solving it. And one of the ways you
can go about solving it is just keep removing him from him
as a body until he's outside of his own force zone. And of
course he'll get well in an awful hurry. All you have to do
is get him outside of his own force zone and then he can
sit there and figure this out. Because what chance has he
got to figure it out if he keeps getting hit by forces all
around him and through him and in him and everything else?
He doesn't have much of a chance.
Now, if he'd just go sit quietly on a pink cloud someplace
- invent a pink cloud in some other time strata and sit
quietly on it for a little while - he would be able to
dope out from what he knows here the rest of it. He'd be
able to rehabilitate his ability to do this and his ability
to do that, and so forth.
That would be a very ideal way to go about it: just have a
very full education on it, and then get booted out and put
into fairly good shape somehow or other, and then dream
yourself up a pink cloud and sit on it. And that would be
- let the MEST universe go to hell for a little while. And
you'd turn up with the answers that you needed to make
yourself able to operate in the MEST universe.
Now, you wonder why anybody would operate in the MEST
universe. Well, I'll tell you why they'll operate in the
MEST universe: it's randomity. You read in the Axioms and
you find randomity. That's right. The MEST universe is a
mighty big target. If you could eat up the MEST universe,
depopulate it and square it around, you'd always be able to
sit down, take the facsimile of having done something to
the MEST universe and give it to somebody you invented to
play football with. It's randomity, action.
Unfortunate - most people don't think there's enough value
in randomity to do anything for the sake of randomity, but
they're low Tone Scale. You get... Almost anybody will do
something for the sake of randomity when you get them up
the Tone Scale a little bit. It should have a project and a
goal and an end and square it around.
So you just take off a nice big project someplace or other
and say, "I think I will..." It doesn't matter what you
say. You can get interested in it and everything else. You
don't have to say, "I think I will destroy the MEST
universe." You could also say, "I think I will build this
big universe that has nothing but force in it and see how
well it gets along, and then one day I'll cashier the whole
works. And I think I'll take off two months of my spacetime
for the project. And let's see, how long is two months of
my space-time?
Well, that will be a hundred billion years of the universe
time which I'm going to create." It's all satisfactory.
That's perfectly satisfactory reasoning. And go ahead and
do it.
Or you could say right here on Earth, "I think I'll clean
up all the vinegar works in England. The trouble with
vinegar works is they need cleaning up." And that's just
what you do. Then you decide you'll get a little society
together and you clean up vinegar works.
The whole trouble is that when people do this they don't
realize that they are dealing with a very elementary
principle: that is, it's just randomity.
They want action, they want motion, so they have to have a
stage and scene for motion. Anything serves as motion, just
anything. You could postulate some kind of a motion that is
going forward and create the motion, and then do something
about it.
And how often do you find somebody doing something about
that? You'll find people running all over the place,
particularly in politics, inventing the most astonishing
and horrible atrocities, just so they can do something
about them. And I wouldn't put it past some of these people
in politics to do these astonishing and horrible atrocities
and get them finished up just so they can go in and do
something about it.
As a matter of fact, Japan used to do that. The Japanese
used to create the incident so they could create the war.
Did it constantly. They would go out - they'd send a
couple of secret-service boys out and have a couple of
their own troops shot and then have the government where
the troops were, apologizing. And if the government didn't
apologize, then they could go in with troops. But they'd
really kill the troops - anything to create randomity.
Now, Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing, here,
is self explanatory. The only things that I would call your
attention to with regard to it is that if you ask the
preclear to "be" rather than "move," you probably will get
further. That just skidded by in the dictation of this. And
it's something that should be punched up. If you have a
copy there you're going to use, make a notation on it.
Should be "Ask the preclear to be a foot back of his head."
And then, "If he is..." But the only reason why you've got
directional areas there - the only reason you've got
directions - is just so that he gets something to be in
relation toward. He wants to be in relationship to
something like dimension and time.
Now, when it comes to this negative step, it doesn't have
the workability which it might have, but will occasionally
work.
When you speak of orientation, by the time you've got to
Step III, it is "move," because you've got somebody so
bogged down by force he will use force, and it'd be a very
high level to have him use force in time and space. That
wouldn't be true of a Step I, so we have a further
differentiation on a Step I.
Let's look over here at Step IV, Ridge Running. I'll make
you a bet: I don't believe any of you have used Ridge
Running worth a nickel. Why not?
I'll bet you two or three of the cases that you're having
trouble with that I have heard of vaguely, here and there,
will resolve by Ridge Running. You haven't used it.
Female voice: I said it yesterday. I would like to meet the
IV because I've never met one.
Oh, have you met a V?
Female voice: Yes.
Have you processed a V?
Female voice: Yes.
And he won't do a IV.
Female voice: Well, he does a I now.
Well, what'd you do, hit V and then go DED-DEDEX and then boom?
Female voice: Tried IV. Did I, II, III, IV in a normal
manner before I arrived at V.
And he didn't do IV?
Female voice: And he didn't do IV.
You haven't met a IV, huh? Well, I've met two or three IVs
that I don't think would have solved easily on anything
else. These guys had to know something was happening before
it could even vaguely happen.
Now, here we have orientation in the theta universe...
pardon me, in the MEST universe. Shorthanding what I'm
saying here - orientation in the theta universe. And I'd
like to add to this, why don't you orient him in his own
universe, huh? How about thinking about that? That occur to
you?
Female voice: No.
All the way down the line when it says "orientation,"
remember that it can mean "orient him in the MEST universe"
or "orient him in his own universe." And they'd be two
different processes. You'd have him invent some time and
then some space and then orient himself in it. And the
possibility is that this would be a superior technique to
orienting him in the MEST universe. I haven't tried it. I
just look it over and I say, "Well, there's a technique
sitting there - orient him in his own universe." You might
have him going right back to his own universe. Because, you
see, his universe isn't located in space in relationship to
MEST space; it's just elsewhere in that it is not here.
Because here means this space, it does not mean a time
difference.
All right. You might do a lot by just asking a fellow to
describe to you what kind of a universe he had up to the
time it blew up, or whether it blew up. What happened to
it? You might say, "What kind of a universe was it?" And
just keep... He keeps describing what kind of a universe it
was, and, "Orient yourself this way" and, "Orient yourself
that way in it," and, "Describe it some more," and that
might be the fastest technique which we have.
As I say, I haven't tested it.
You're liable to find all sorts of weird things. You're
liable to find some preclear of yours that can't get color,
had never heard of color till he hit the MEST universe, and
he hasn't seen it since. I mean, it's just a concept that
he never got as his own idea. It wasn't part of his home
universe or anything like it. And you might recover to him
all of his skills just by doing that. Interesting thought.
Now, with regard to the general material which is here, we
have an organization, really, which you have been using for
some little time. You might give me a comment. You might
give me a comment. Have you found this working with your
preclears?
Audience: Yes. Yes. It does work.
Yes, it's working.
Male voice: It does, yes.
Where have you found it falling down? Has it fallen down anyplace?
Male voice: Yes, the only place I find that it's got any,
any falling - down is in the fact that the preclears
themselves, in lack of confidence in what you're doing with
them.
Got a lack of confidence in you?
Male voice: A lack of confidence in the particular thing
that is being done.
Female voice: They are very MEST bound, you know? "Theta
Clearing - what's it mean?" Well, you know. "Am I liable to
be able to have nine thousand pounds a year and a
large-sized car and two wives if I want to, as a Theta
Clears Wouldn't it be much better to be a MEST Clear?" That
sort of...
Male voice: You use mock-up, you see, and the person says,
"Hm, that's fine. But I'm not sure that this will make me
well! Are you sure?"
Okay, I have an answer for that. Audit outside of your
body. Now, that's the best remedy I know for that, offhand,
is audit outside of your body and make the sound and
auditing commands emanate from out of your body, and
don't have a body at all while you're auditing. Oh, I
think you'd get results.
Male voice: The auditor has to do that, now?
Well, I'm... You asked me; you've made the statement.
That's very, very fatal, by the way, to pose me a problem.
I most always have a solution, because there aren't very
many serious problems in the MEST universe. It's kind of a
silly universe. It's a universe everybody's been working so
hard to solve because it didn't have anything to solve in it.
All right. What business have you got sitting there in a
body auditing anybody anyhow? Let's be tough about this.
Come on, what's the idea? What's the idea?
Female voice: Even if you don't, the preclear still
identifies you with your body.
Oh, it's not important. This is not important. This is not
important. If you had... your sound of your voice was
rolling out a thing, and he identified you... I tell you,
once upon a time we did do this: We made a picture of an
angel and made it talk to a psychotic. The psychotic was so
upset about people that I said, "Well, let's audit him
without a person!" How simple. We did. He got well. He got
well very fast.
So this is a big thought, you see. I mean, you could say,
"Now, you'd really be much better off without a body. Look
at me." The fellow says, "Where?" And you say, "Well, right
here." And put a doll there or something, you see? And make
the doll's jaw move or something, so he feels like the talk
is coming from there.
And you say, "Now, pick up the doll and see if there are
any wires connected to it. Now look in the back of the doll
and see if there's any radio connections with it. That's
right. Now put me back down on the desk here.
That's right. Put me down in the little doll's chair.
That's fine. That's fine.
All right. Now how about you being a foot back of your
head?" Of course, you could say at the same time, and just
as fast as that, "Every night before you go to bed,
hereafter, you will say your prayers and you will remember
- remember to say your prayers to Bill Spinbin, HDA, and
remember that he is God." You'd do that too. And you... if
you went at this wide a disagreement with the MEST universe,
that's obviously what you are, that's all.
Well, I've given you a solution to overcome this objection.
I don't see why you don't find it a satisfactory solution.
Here I'm sitting here talking to you without a body.
[SofMU says - Please note: This lecture ends abruptly as did
the original master recording.]
[The cassette continues on briefly beyond this point]
> female voice: We know that because we don't identify you with
> your body, but a difficult preclear always identifies
> you with your body and for the other preclear it doesn't make
> any different, he could be outside. Their not easy and they
> can't see any difference if your in your body, outside your
> body, ...
>
> Well what are you doing filling up the universe and letting
> go make their own universe a bunch of mean, onery,
> cantankerous preclears?
[here it really does end]
Online auditing in any place on the planet https://timecops.net/english.html
SECRETS OF THE MEST UNIVERSE
The November Lecture Series of 1952
Posted in support of setting the tech free.
**************************************************
CONTENTS: - SECRETS OF THE MEST UNIVERSE
1. LS-1/3 6 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - THE THETAN AS AN ENERGY UNIT
2. LS-2/3 7 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - FORCE AS HOMO SAPIENS
AND AS THETAN - RESPONSIBILITY
3. LS-4A 14 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - BE, HAVE AND DO, PART I
TIME, SPACE, ENERGY IN RELATION TO DO
4. LS-4B 14 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - BE, HAVE AND DO, PART II
5. LS-5 ? 16 NOV 52 METHODS OF RESEARCH - SELF-DETERMINISM AND
CREATION OF UNIVERSES
[The 1st 4 previously issued as OT cassettes #11, 12, 13, 15, and 16
- number 13 being LS-3 which is split between the 1st & 2nd of
the SofMU lectures. These have been verified against the old
tapes and the occasional omission has been marked ">". The
last lecture is unverified and may be LPC-6 instead of LS-5 (see
transcript)]
**************************************************
FREEZONE BIBLE MISSION STATEMENT
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians,
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
Thank You,
The FZ Bible Association
**************************************************
Secrets of the Mest Universe lecture 1.
"Methods of Research - The Thetan as an Energy Unit"
LS-1 plus part of LS-3.
This consists of LS-1 (The November 1952 Lecture Series #1)
which was previously available as #11 in the OT cassettes
which in turn was a direct copy of the reels as done by
the Flag ship in 1974 plus the first side of LS-3 which
was #13 in the OT cassettes. Note that SofMU lecture 2
includes LS-2 which was OT cassette #12 and the rest of
lecture LS-3.
The later SofMU version (and the identical transcript in
R&D volume 12) has edited out some sentences which are
marked ">" in this transcript.
5211C06A LS-1 (60 min)
METHODS OF RESEARCH - THE THETAN AS AN ENERGY UNIT
A lecture given 6 November 1952
I would like to talk to you on this paper, "Standard
Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing" [See this issue in
the Appendix of this volume.] This is the first of Standard
Operating Procedures. Possibly there will be others, but
they will all be referred to with a modification if they
come out. I don't see at the moment much modification in
view. Therefore, it's perfectly safe to make a talk here on
Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing.
Now, a great deal of the data in this will be found in
Scientology 8-80, when that is available to you here. It is
available right this minute, by the way, from the States.
It's a very spectacular little volume. It has... on the
cover of it, it has "Life = EI/-R x -f." That's all it's
got on the cover.
And anyway, a terrific amount of this material is in there,
such as subzero Tone Scale, transfer of energy between
facsimiles and a lot of this and that.
Well now, the origination of Standard Operating Procedure
of Theta Clearing has been done since - oh, a long time
ago - 1932, actually.
And the first study on this subject was electronics.
Electronics of the human mind - were there any? With the
knowledge available at that time, anything that was known
about the electronics of the human mind at that time could
be summed up in one very eloquent word: bunk. There was a
lot of hocus-pocus and presto chango and nonsense.
And yet even at that time the psychiatrists were rushing in
where intelligent beings would fear to tread and were
busily giving people electric shocks and all sorts of
things. There is nothing more wonderful about the MEST
universe than the ability of some within it, and some who
created it, to use everything for the wrong purpose so that
ital wind up wronger. This universe, a few million years
from now, will probably be a solid lump of lead or
something of the sort, because it's tailor-made not to have
anything run right in it.
So in 1932, to look at the rather baffling picture of the
human mind and what was known about the human mind and to
find out that people actually dared, without knowing
anything about it, to avidly use electronics on it was
actually more than could be borne.
I started to work on it. I just started to work it over and
try to find out what - colloquially - cooked. And you
know, I started in thinking that somebody knew something
about it. I really did. I thought something was known -
not about electronics, but about the human mind.
You see, I could easily find what was known about
electronics. It was very easy to find that. James Clerk
Maxwell, Newton - there was a character kicking around in
those days by the name of Einstein; a fellow by the name of
Planck hadn't gotten very busy yet. But Lorentz and
FitzGerald had already done their evil worst with C. The
work that everybody thinks Einstein did was done by
Lorentz, FitzGerald, you see? And the work which Einstein
did, nobody's been able to figure out, but it's, "He did
it." And it's very wonderful. It's resulting, everybody
says, in an atomic bomb, except that the person whose work
the atomic bomb came from was named Planck.
The information about electronics was there, but it was
just about as scrambled when it applies to this sort of
thing as the people to whom it's credited. We find the most
fascinating things about that.
For instance, you had a young chap over here that did the
basic work that made the electronic bomb, or the
thingamabob bomb - it's hardly an atomic bomb. He explored
the orbits and so forth. He has a comet named after him. A
pretty interesting guy.
If I remember rightly, one fellow - The most brilliant
work that was done in this field was done by some fellow -
I don't think he was twenty-one. And the British government
in its "Oh, we won't give a damn about that. That might be
important or somebody might consider it important" sent him
down to Gallipoli and he died on the beach there in the
barbed wire with a gut full of bayonets, with his work
one-third done.
So, anyway, the interesting part of this history was that
nobody seemed to have gotten organized about it. You had
boundless theories. And the second you went into the human
mind, you would have a feeling that somebody knew something
about the human mind. You'd just have this feeling, because
so many people spoke of it with such terrific authority.
You know, they made up in sound volume what they lacked in
information.
And I was particularly amazed, in 1947, to finally find, at
last and long length, that psychoanalysis not only did not
work but made patients worse.
Now, that's how dumb I have been on this. I actually
believed, in 1932 - because I studied Freud; I studied this
under the tutelage of one of his more brilliant pupils, a
Commander Thompson. Commander Thompson was sent there by
the US Navy to study with Freud for a long period of time
and to come back and do something with psychoanalysis with
the US Navy. He was practically the first and only
authority in the United States. There's hardly anybody else
in the United States did more than maybe get a curt
thank-you letter from Sigmund Freud. And they have taken
these very curt thank-you letters and have established
their complete and full reputation since. That and a
Viennese accent.
You see, in the United States, it's a little bit different
than here. You cannot possibly succeed in the field of the
mind if you were to call it the field of the mind or
anything like that - you have to have an accent, and the
phonier the better. You can get these accents; it's easy to
pick up the accent. As a matter of fact, it takes longer to
pick up the accent than it does the information you use.
But once the accent has been picked up, why, you could be a
howling success there. It's very wonderful.
Well, anyway, not wandering off the subject a bit, imagine
my embarrassment - because I'd gone on till 1947 supposing
there was such a thing as a psychotherapy. Well, I had my
off-brand of this sort of thing which was mixed up with
hypnotism and sort of based upon the endocrine reflex...
the endocrine alarm-reaction system of the body, and so on.
There was... I had a therapy worked out. And I just hadn't
paid very much attention to Commander Thompson, I'm afraid,
because what I thought was psychoanalysis is suddenly
discovered by me in 1947 to be a wild, wild distance from
psychoanalysis.
I was proceeding logically in one fashion or another and I
- as far as sexual activity is concerned and that sort of
thing, this was just wonderful. I mean, Thompson had come
back and had said so often that Freud really meant social,
"the social part of man," when he was saying "sexual part
of man" that I just skipped over all that. And an awful big
joke on me: I had never turned around and found, when he
said "libido theory," exactly what he meant. He meant
libido theory. He didn't mean the birds and bees or
anything. He didn't mean anything off-track. He meant sex!
I've read his papers on it. And I read another interesting
paper by that gentleman, by the way, that would fascinate
you and you want to read it some time.
By the way, if you want to pass a psychiatric examination,
just get all of Freud's papers and memorize the dates and
the titles and then go before the American College of
Psychiatry and you can become a psychiatrist. You don't
have to know what's in them. There isn't anything in them
anyway.
But this process is entirely different from what you'd
think it was - entirely different. You wouldn't really have
any conception - knowing what you do now and doing and
working with the tools you're working with now, you
wouldn't realize that you haven't just moved next door.
You've moved over this range of mountains, off of this
planet, into that galaxy and over into another universe.
I'm laying this down with a heavy ax in case anybody ever
asks you to do a translation of Dianetics into terms that a
psychoanalyst can understand.
Don't ever try it, because they're not related subjects.
One is logical and it works, and the other has to do with
sex and it's lots of fun.
Now, that's bitter. But he fooled me. In that particular
regard, I don't like to be fooled.
In some line of work of research - in engineering, you
read a paper and it says that Henry Blitzen has connected
two electrodes with a 220-volt current running there and
has found out that this flow registered so-and-so on a
voltmeter. If you want to go and get a voltmeter and set up
these conditions, you'll find out, sure enough, it
registers so-and-so, thereby showing the resistance of wire
as such and such or something. It'll do it every time. You
can go around to every laboratory in the world where any
electricity is available and rig up this equipment, and the
voltmeter keeps on reading that same reading.
Well, when you speak of a meter, you speak as close to
accuracy as science has been able to come. Einstein's
possible claim to fame will someday be these words: "All an
observer has a right to do is read the meter and report its
exact result - report its reading." That's what an
observer should do. He should not interpret the meter at
any time. And as long as a science hews to that line, you
have reliable information. And if a science can't do that,
don't bother to laugh up your sleeve, guffaw out loud.
Because it's not a science, it is not logical, it is not
organized and it has nothing to do with reality, but is
somebody's happy little jim-dandy, screwball delusion.
Beware a law which is stated at some length and then of
which it is suddenly said, "But of course, there are these
exceptions." Just skip it. The second you see that thing
and it said, "These exceptions append to this law," throw
it in the nearest ashcan and turn around yourself and find
out what the law in the subject really is. Don't expect to
find it in a textbook; you should be able to figure it out.
And if somebody had told me a little more loudly in 1932,
"You have a perfect right to figure out these things
yourself," we would have been a lot further ahead. Because
that's the one thing the MEST universe tells you not to do:
Don't ever figure it out. It's very verboten. And it's a
very, very good thing. Even in the great, honored realms of
science they'll tell you, "Well, of course, we know - heh.
Of course, privately, we don't know what the hell we do
know. But you... You never will know, but you are permitted
to worship... you are permitted to worship before this
great sacred cow." That's actually a primary method.
Now, every once in a while you will find a professor who
sparkles like a diamond and he will rage and tear around
and say, "Well, damn it, figure it out!" Now, there's one
such at MIT. He is the exception rather than the rule.
They call him "Ninety-nine Percent" Johnson. He said, "If
you can ask the question of the universe properly, it is
already ninety-nine percent answered." Now, I'm giving you
here, really, little guide rules for research. These rules
work. There's only one thing you want to know from anybody:
What is the law and what does the meter read? And does the
meter often read otherwise? And the second he says, "Well,
it's kind of like this, but ve, o'er in Vienna - ve have
made a great study of this, and ve have special meters that
read the same all the time. They are painted meters; they
have painted needles on them. And ve have found that the
great, the great successes in the field of psychoanalysis
stem from the fact that these meters always read success.
Now, if you vant to reduce it to science, oh, ve are
scientists." So is the garbage man a scientist. He goes
around picking up odds and ends and throwing them into a
truck, too, without any order. No order, no discipline.
Adler, Jung... Think of it. Think of these guys. Think of
this guy Jung.
He obviously had some brains - obviously did. And what
does he run into?
He runs into past lives. Crush! And now he figures out the
great esoterics of past lives. (Now, we'll all cross
ourselves here!) And the next thing you know, we're all
studying Druidism, and that's all the past life there is
and that's everything that... He must have been stuck on
the track, being dumped in or out of some burned bole of
some tree or something. Or maybe when he was young he was a
blue baby. There's some purpose for this, but that's Jung.
"And Jung has done great vork - don't mistake it." He has
put a lot of printers and engravers - given them a lot of
employment. And right now he keeps a lot of library shelves
from being empty. But it's just fantastic. It's fantastic!
They could get ahold of a datum...
Breuer sat down and found out that if a woman talked long
enough her psychosis went kaboom! He found this out. He saw
it happen.
So instead of just keeping people talking long enough,
Freud gets in there and pitches, and he says, "It's all
sex." He didn't even evaluate what they were talking about.
If he'd just taken a continuous tape record and noted the
exact moment in each case and just let enough people talk
long enough, he would have found out there was a constant.
He would have found out that they got well, more or less,
around the certain points. And if you wanted to treat this
with a scientific method, you actually could have taken
endless tapes and made dictation notes on them and had them
clicking through a time machine as to what they were
talking about and when they got well.
In other words, you kept a record, which is the first
scientific rule: Keep a record! Now, you can keep the
record in your head if you know what you're doing, but keep
a record.
Now, once in a while somebody says to me, "You don't keep a
record of what you're doing." The hell I don't! I keep a
record - this is actually a record.
You would... just wouldn't believe me if I told you there
was practically no thought or research behind this. But
there isn't. There isn't any thought or research, as you
think of it, of taking endless notes, notes, notes and then
trying to find these and compare. That is not the way I do
research. We found some of the basic fundamentals, and you
know practically every word or thought along the track of
figuring out an equation.
And all it is, is a long mathematical equation. It has all
arrived there by deduction and extrapolation from certain
basic facts which were found to be true. And all this is,
is a straight, direct breakdown of the Axioms.
Now, you'd hardly believe that, but that's... that happens
to be true.
This is a breakdown of the Axioms. If you recombine the
Axioms and look them over, you'll find out that it breaks
down to this - it has to be that. It just has to be that,
that's all. You look over the Axioms. These Axioms are
true, and they were sweeping ahead and showing up things.
And all the Axioms were, were the constant data which had
been turned out from the primary principle "Survive," and
the mind as a computing machine which tries to resolve
problems relating to survival. How simple.
But actually what we're doing here is a form of
mathematics. It's a form of mathematics. Now, every once in
a while, just for the hell of it, I put these things into
practice in the material universe. They always work. They
don't work because I say they work.
> You can put these things into the hands of some Chineese
> and send him to Hong Kong and we'll have cleared chinks.
What's the difference? What's the difference, then, between
this investigation which we're doing, on which we're
engaged, and past investigations?
What's the essential difference?
Well, it was one: the assumption that the problem could be
solved. Now, boy, that is an arbitrary assumption. There is
no reason to believe the problem can be solved. But we
throw in the one arbitrary which was thrown in on the track
ahead of survival. There's an arbitrary sitting there, and
that arbitrary says the problem can be solved - the
problem of the human mind can be solved. Now, that should
tell you a lot. You throw an arbitrary ahead of a law in
order to get a law. That's called heuristic thinking.
You postulate something and see if it works. And you... if
it doesn't work you postulate something else.
Get the psychosis of somebody, though, who postulates that
all cats are green and then can't unpostulate it. Is he in
sad shape! He's in terrible condition if he does that. He
said, "The basis of all things are Druidism, are Druidism,
are Druidism" - millions of words on the subject - "are
Druidism, are Druidism." He just got caught in the groove
in his own record and he couldn't unpostulate the
postulate, that's all.
Now, let's look at that as a mechanical proposition, a
therapy that we know about - postulate. This person wasn't
thinking; this person was continuing onward from a
postulate which he could not undo! Having made the
postulate, he was stuck with it! So if you ever do
investigation or observation, for God's sakes, remember
that. Never stick yourself with a postulate and then have a
feeling like you have to make the postulate good just
because you made it. For heaven's sakes, have enough
humility once in a while to say, "What do you know, I was
wrong!"
> Throw it in the wastebaske... [gap]
But they're natural laws. Let's divorce this thing
from Hubbard's ideas or opinions. You know, when I tell you
that everything that has been done on this exact line is
written down and is known to you, I speak to you the truth.
The only missing data there would be - the things I had
thought of and threw away. I didn't even bother to keep
notebooks on them. And somebody says, "That's a gap, then,
in the research line." The heck it is! The heck it is. You
can take these and get about eighty-five billion times more
data than I threw away! And I didn't throw away any
valuable data. The stuff was junk! I did an experiment one
time - "the great god Throgmagog." I invented him one
morning. I said, "By golly, I bet you he's got some
therapeutic use. I wonder what this conscious mind is? What
is this conscious mind?" So I said, "Let's see, you ought
to be able to hypnotize somebody..." Used an awful lot of
hypnotism in early research. God bless Charcot; that's all
I got to say.
And God bless Anton Mesmer.
All right. These boys I was working with here and there
were usually very good hypnotic subjects. Once in a while
I'd pick up an awfully bad hypnotic subject just to find
out what made him tick, why he was so terrible as an
hypnotic subject, because hypnotism was a wild variable.
In science, in good investigation, look for the wild
variable. Look for that thing which is wild, which isn't
acting right, which acts this way, this way and that way,
that way. And there is where your use comes in of the
natural law which has a thousand exceptions.
You say, "Boy, you mean somebody knows a datum which
doesn't operate right? And there are exceptions to it?
Well, gee, that thing is probably the clue to the biggest,
doggonedest puzzle! We can even go and look and find out
what that puzzle is!" There must be a puzzle there if
you've got an erratic behavior. And if we can't break it
down on what we know about the mind, we probably have
opened the chapter of a whole new... a whole new study any
time that happens. So remember this about wild variables.
Well, anyway, I invented this great god Throgmagog for one
single and solitary purpose: to find out if the conscious
mind could be removed from the individual and be made to
think and give orders to the individual thereafter.
Did that in 1947. Nineteen forty-seven, the first few
months, I'd actually gone and gotten the actual books of
psychoanalysis of Jung, Adler and the rest of the boys, and
I'd given them a good hard run. I burned the midnight oil
on these things - burned it hard - because I was doing a
review of what I thought they were doing. And I found out
that I had steered a course over the hills and far away. I
found out that Breuer's knowledge of hypnotism was very
elementary, that I'd thrown an awful lot of data onto the
track which had been picked up elsewhere and then said,
"Well, that belongs too, then." And that is not the case.
So it became almost anything but the case.
All right. Breuer's work indicated, however, people could
be hypnotized and it had some connection with
psychotherapy. That's an important datum.
If he'd stuck with that - be famous forever.
All right. Here we had the ability to put a person out and
do something about his mind. What can we do about his mind?
So I invent the great god Throgmagog, I say, "All right,"
to this fellow, "you are now the great god Throgmagog, and
you will now step two feet to the right of yourself and you
will thereafter do thinking and computing and give you all
the advice which you need on the subject. Five, four,
three, two, one, snap! Wake up." The great god Throgmagog.
And the guy would go around for days doing brilliant
things, the like of which you never heard of. Just
brilliant things. It's something like doing long division
of fifteen numbers divided into twenty-one hundred numbers,
or something like that, with right answers - calculating
machine problems, and all that sort of thing. How would he
do these things?
He would turn around and he would say, "The problem is
so-and-so and so-and-so. The answer is so-and-so and
so-and-so." The great god Throgmagog.
My idea was that somehow or other you could remove the mind
from the influence of the reactive mind, which I'd already
spotted. And if you could do this, you would have an
unlimited, unaberrated self.
And what was I doing? It takes five years to find out what
I was doing! Otherwise, that's just another experiment.
That's one of the fastest ways to Theta Clear I know.
Except don't tell the guy he's also inside. Tell him to get
out and stay out, and to monitor this thing from a
distance, and you got a Theta Clear. And it gives you a
whole new method of Theta Clearing right there.
Svengali. You're talking about hypnotism and so on - boom
him out. Put him under deep trance and knock him out of his
head if you can't do anything else. Shoot him full of
narcosynthesis and kick him out. Possibly you could do a
thousand things like this, but our later results tell us
one thing else: he must get out in a highly self-determined
state or he'll cave in. And the great god Throgmagog always
caved in, in almost exactly two weeks. The self-determinism
punch would last... its highest level would be reached in
three days, then would lower and would be gone in a few
weeks. Interesting, isn't it? Five years ago - the great
god Throgmagog.
But investigation is something you do by proceeding from
something which gave results and to which you can find no
exceptions. And let me give you the other little clue to
this is, look for exceptions - to hell with the proofs!
You can prove anything. But find exceptions to what you've
just thought of.
Take objection to what you've just done. Believe it utterly
while you're doing it, and then turn around and reject it
completely and say there are exceptions to this thing.
Do you know how long the word survival was under
investigation for exceptions? It was under investigation
for exceptions for five years. For five years I refused to
believe that survival had any basis to man. And I kept
trying to find something that wouldn't equate into the word
survival. And I couldn't find anything for five years, and
that's a long time to look.
Now, that should tell you a great deal about auditing.
Now, in the process of auditing, what you are doing is
using a series of discoveries which were found by
extrapolation, logical extrapolation. They were not found
by amassing enormous amounts of data. Inductive logic was
the basis of this research, and the invention of a
mathematics of logic which is not dissimilar to symbolic
logic made it possible to add up facts, associate facts.
But first one had to know that mathematics was a
theoretical thing and that to apply it to the real universe
you had to recognize it as a theoretical thing and be
perfectly willing to associate similarities, even though
vague, rather than x's are always x's and c's are always c's.
Now, you as an auditor start in on a case, you're using a
whole lot of these laws. You're using a lot of them.
They're there; they're there for you to investigate. There
are two reasons why they might not be there for you: is,
one, you are stuck on one of your own postulates; another,
that you are indoctrinated to such depth that you couldn't
escape it; another is that you have some sort of a fear or
mores or something of the sort which you mustn't overthrow;
and another one would be they're not true, that would be
the other one.
So the way to investigate them, evidently, would be in this
wise: it would be to take those first few conditions there
and apply them and find out if there's some reason - if
this thing doesn't seem to be working for you - why you
don't want it to work. That's always a good thing to ask
yourself.
Now, what would be your arbitrary with every preclear?
Because when we look at a preclear, we are looking at the
whole universe of Scientology.
What arbitrary do we have to postulate the moment we look
at a preclear?
We follow the same course, actually, as the investigation
itself. We have to postulate his case can be resolved. And,
by George, you'd better postulate it.
The next one is, is "Do I want to resolve his case?" And if
you don't want to resolve his case, don't! But don't say to
yourself, "I ought to be able to want to resolve his case."
You won't travel on it. Just ask yourself. This would scare
into view this fact: "Heck no. I think that women ought to
be aberrated," or "Heck no, I think men really ought to be
(something or other)," or "I think old men ought to be
under the thumb. They're dangerous." If you fail to ask
yourself - fail to make such a postulate or find out why
you can't make such a postulate about a case - you'll do
the darnedest things sometimes, quite to your own surprise,
your own amazement.
Why, every time you start to audit this preclear you keep
changing your mind and giving him the wrong signals. You're
operating on a postulate. Your postulates are only as
valuable as you value them or as they are workable.
So in auditing we're following very much the same course as
was followed in research. A very strange fact, but the
research line of this is quite consistent and hews the line
very closely, and the manifestations which you find are
rather standard.
Now, the higher common denominator we have reached today
actually is so easy to generalize with that you can apply
it to practically any case you meet with great ease.
Let's start out with the first one. This fellow could be
called - incorrectly, on a little lower echelon - an
energy unit located inside his head.
That's pretty correct, pretty correct. You'll find
occasionally, though, a preclear is big enough and
relatively unaberrated, and he's a big thetan. He thinks of
himself as being a big guy. And when he steps out he's a
big guy.
He's not just that big. He's maybe much bigger than his body.
Fantastic. If you found somebody who was in pretty good
shape, that would be his concept of himself. After you've
worked for a little while, your concept of yourself ought
to get bigger, and you ought to feel yourself as pretty big.
All right. We know that. Now let's define that unit just a
little better.
Let's define the unit in terms of capabilities rather than
in terms of MEST universe dimensions. This unit is capable
of locating in space and time, matter and energy;
converting, conserving, altering in many ways, starting and
stopping matter and energy in space and time, and - what
do you know - is also capable of inventing space and time,
and is probably capable of inventing so many more things
than space and time that space and time look like a little
schoolboy's game.
Don't underestimate what this thing can do because along
that line lies the advance in processing, is what can we
find that everybody can do? What could we find?
Could he postulate, for instance...? Let's just take
postulate and the proposition: Could you have your preclear
suddenly say to himself, "I am in the year booz-wooz. And
the year booz-wooz contains a signboard, and that's all."
And he could all of a sudden... It'd be some trick like
this, so don't inhibit yourself in the tricks. Don't
inhibit yourself, because the thing you're working with is
completely uninhibited, which has been inhibited by
becoming to believe it ought to be inhibited! Wonderful
trick, you see?
Now, if you could discover something that this thing could
do that was in advance or different than space and time,
which native ability - native ability, infinity ability -
which ability had never been inhibited, you'd have an
instantaneous Theta Clear.
You see how that could work? I mean, if you could find
something that was beyond space, time, matter and energy,
which he could do that he could transfer over to, why, it
would be with the greatest of ease that he could suddenly
handle all this.
A thousand routes are open - a thousand, thousand,
thousand routes are open to you to a faster process than
Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing.
But this is a basic route. We know this works. We know this
works. This even works on rough cases if you work with them
for a while.
Now, we know a lot of the reasons and a lot of the bugs you
have to get out of the case in order to make this work. But
just because I tell you, "This is Standard Operating
Procedure" and just because as a good auditor you ought to
know this thing colder than any turkey ever got, this isn't
all the therapy there is. Because with this we have
discovered a strange fact: It can locate matter and energy
in space and time. It can also locate, invent, change,
convert, conserve and upset time and space itself, and then
locate matter and energy in it. Oh, boy! Sky's the limit.
If this confounded thing can do that, it isn't even vaguely
limited by the MEST universe - not even vaguely limited by
the MEST universe nor by its own universes nor by the
concept of universes. Lord knows what it can do! And
probably nobody has ever realized that himself. But the
least that it can do is be so completely original,
theoretically, that what it was original about would bear
no relationship to the MEST universe.
An artist starts out with this capability and spins in
quick, because everybody is at great pains to tell him at
every turn that he can't think of anything original, it's
all been thought of before. This is the swan song and the
end of every career as an artist: "It's all been thought of
before." The hell it has! I have written stories that
hadn't been thought of before, but I never published them.
And the reason why is they would have to have been thought
of - to be a publishable, acceptable communication line,
they have to contain elements which have been thought of
before. But you're trying to communicate with the story,
and that's something else. So let's not get stuck on this
and get all identified on this basis. So you see how simple
that is?
Yes, I have written stories which are completely original
and utterly unintelligible to anybody else - completely
unintelligible, no communication at all. They weren't even
written. They were really original. And of course then you
say, "What were they?" Right away I would have to translate
them into terms which were common-denominator terms. The
second I did that I would have to change the story so that
it had been thought of before, so that the person to whom
you're communicating could receive it in the language. And
the fact that they're told in language says all these words
have been thought of before.
So you see, what a far cry it is from the fact of
originality to communicating what you think.
Now, let's look at the basic condition of our thetan and
let's follow, very rapidly here, right straight through
what he probably does. He's sitting there and he's part of
(quote) "the main body of theta," and for some reason or
other he starts setting up his own universe. We're not
quite sure why. Maybe there is no reason. Maybe he just
sets up his own universe. Maybe he got set up and then he
set up his own universe. Lord knows what. And the universe
which he set up was set up with an unlimited - no
arbitraries, except those which he imposed upon it himself
and well knew that he imposed upon it. So he set up this
universe.
And now let's get differences of universes. One preclear
has set up a universe that doesn't have any time in it. He
just set it up with a big space and it hasn't got any time
in it. So it's got no motion and no energy in it.
Perfectly legitimate. Just because matter here is in motion
is no reason why you've got to have only matter which is in
motion. The only reason we have matter here that's in
motion is because it's the easiest way to make matter.
That's something like, well, the reason guys work is it's
the harder way of doing something easy. One of those
things; no sense to it.
All right. Now, let's say this other universe, it's a
complete universe except maybe it didn't have any green in
it. That was its sole lacking factor.
All right. Let's take another preclear, and we'll find out
that his basic universe didn't have any pain in it. He
never saw any necessity to put any pain in it because he
didn't have any force in it. There was no force in this
universe, but there was motion. But there wasn't any force.
But one obtained motion simply by changing forms. And he
didn't see any reason to have any substance to the forms.
And if he had no reason to have any substance to the forms,
he had no reason to have any force, so there was naturally
no pain.
And he depended, let us say, upon the people he peopled his
universe with, if he peopled them at all - that's a
specialized idea, you see - if he peopled this universe
with a lot of people, why, he probably kept them interested
in life simply with a lot of high-band ideas. Didn't have
anything to do with pain.
He'd set down a moral code and he'd say... that said
so-and-so and so-and-so, and it said, "People that do not
dance are immoral." That was all there was to it. And then
people would come around and ask him, "What's immoral?" And
he'd say, "Oooh!" That was all there was to it. Universe
ran like a top. Nothing wrong with this universe.
All right. There's hardly anybody set up a universe with
this damn thing called sound. Let me tell you something
about sound. Sound is only necessary because it's a
360-degree perceptic. And it's a good warning of danger. So
it automatically takes a universe with a lot of danger in
it to be a universe that has to contain sound. Now, you
follow that, don't you? It has to be a dangerous universe
or sound would have no value.
All right. We take a universe with no sound in it - very
interesting; how would you communicate? Well, all right,
let's communicate with light beams.
Let's don't just interchange ideas or flows or something of
the sort; let's have communication in that universe, only
let's have light beams and people imagine a screen and
imagine the light on the screen and the light plays back
and forth across the screen and that communicates ideas.
But, gee, do you know what that means? That means the
people of that universe would have to have the power of
creating energy! Oh, and to a craven, cowardly, sort of a
stupid - not even a craven, cowardly fellow, but just a
dull, stupid kind of a fellow, like the kind of a fellow
that'd create the MEST universe - that would be
unthinkable! Because that's probably his highest trick.
Now, you've known some magician who would have some trick.
He's a parlor magician and he has a deck of cards, and they
are very, very greasy, old, thumbed cards. And he comes in
and he says, "Take a card." And you take a card and you
look at it carefully and he says, "You got it?" And you
say, "Yup." Now, he cuts the deck very carefully, looks at
that card and he says, "Now put it back on the pile." You
put it back on the pile, and he puts this other on top of
it. "Now," he says, "I'll tell you what card you took." And
he finally brings it out and he says, "There!" Now, if you
were to... you yourself had a little skill in this and... Gee.
Boy, would he be upset if you took that deck of cards and
did a pass with them and said, "Well, have a card." He
takes a card, you do a pass, put it back on the pile, and
you flip them over and say, "There's your card." Or let him
shuffle them, or anything. He'd say it couldn't be done -
obviously it couldn't be done. He'd be a pretty dumb
magician, truth be told. He probably would not have a
capability of appreciating a higher level of magic if he
thought this trick of one card was so damn valuable.
Well, that's kind of like the MEST universe. The guy who
thought this one up, thought this one up this wise: "Let's
see, I can't think up anything but this one thing - that's
force. Force. I've got a pretty good idea that there are
other universes around, and if this force suddenly goes
through my time and I keep changing the time of the force,
it'll pick up all these other universes and blow these good
ideas into this universe, because every time this force
connects with any universe, of course it'll explode it or
something." He'd think of this one trick, this one stupid
trick that anybody could think of, you see. Force. That's
the easy one. That's the easiest idea to think of.
Now, it could be that it's just sort of the common
denominator of universes when they collided. Maybe
everybody had his own universe and it all collided.
But you know where it left you? If you had a universe and
you were sitting there - it might have been a universe
without color; it was usually a universe without sound -
sometimes it was. You had various things about this universe.
And all of a sudden, one day, you were sitting there in
your own universe and it went kapow! Gee, it'd startle you.
And it would probably contain sound and electrical explosion.
And that's the common denominator of fear: force wave with
sound. If you want to scare anybody, use a force wave with
sound and you've got it.
People are very troubled about sound - much more troubled
than they are about light. That tells them they couldn't
handle sound. So maybe they held on to this and they
decided they'd study what this blast was. And they might be
holding on to it ever since. They might be trying to
protect their own universe from the blast. The last
fleeting moment of "It was all theirs," and they never got
the moment of transition. And then they thought the blast
had changed their universe around; they were in another
universe.
You see where that mix-up would come on the track, the kind
of a mix-up it'd be? Possibly you will find this as one of
the most aberrative factors in your preclear. I don't know.
But we play around with home universe in the preclears and
so forth.
The evolution of beingness is at this moment a bit of a
mystery. When we know more about the evolution of
beingness, we will have easier cases.
So, when it all boils down to the history of the track, we
could be a little more romantic and involved about it and
say here was a fellow and he had a... he was going around
and he had these little illusions and he was building up a
universe with these illusions and he was perfectly happy,
cheerful about the thing. And one day he decided to show
these illusions to another fellow he ran into, sort of time
and space coincidence. And he ran into this other fellow
and he said, "What do you know, there's another being
around here," and he showed him one of these illusions. And
the other fellow said, "That's nothing. Look at this." And
so they sat down and had a nice contest.
They decided who could build the nicest something or other,
and you had a dichotomy starting to work.
And they built this and they built that, and finally one of
them got kind of upset with the other one and invented an
illusion which blew up the other guy's illusions. Could be,
you see.
There's an illusion band on the track that you almost drive
a preclear mad processing, because it's "Die yesterday."
Fellow blows up your illusions, so you say, "You're dead
yesterday," and he's dead yesterday, and therefore your
illusions are right there. That'd be kind of scrambled,
wouldn't it? Fellow would have a tendency to agree on
something else.
All right. However that may be, whatever this illusion is,
if the MEST universe is an inevitable average of all
universes, which it might well be, it nevertheless moved in
on your preclear's universe. And possibly the track starts
with a motivator and not a DED. Maybe he's still holding on
to it. And maybe that's your occasional very occluded case.
Your occasional very occluded case might be holding on to
the explosion which blew up his own universe. It's a cinch
he's holding on to some explosion, because he won't let go.
Now, why don't you run this on such an occluded case just
as an experiment: "I'll study it. I'll look it over. I'll
study it. I won't study it; I will study it; I won't study
it," and find out what you got. Just take a gunshot at it.
And my bet is that you'll give him some nasty somatics.
Because, you see, he had to start out with the premise "I
didn't know," because here you find him not knowing. And
you have to have him stuck in some kind of an incident
where he doesn't know, because he doesn't know.
Here's this fellow who has done the astonishing trick of
forgetting how to create time and space. Well, that is
silly. There is nothing sillier. Would you think... Here
were all the thetans who could create time and space, and
all of a sudden here's a thetan that can't create time and
space anymore.
That is something like... just as astonishing as here's a
little five-year old boy and he's always liked ice cream,
and one day he forgets there is such a thing as ice cream.
You go up to him and you say, "Would you like an ice cream
cone, Johnny?" And he says, "What's that?" And you say,
"Well, just like the ice cream cone I gave you yesterday!"
You'd say, "Gee, the poor kid! What's the matter with this
guy?" Well, that's about the suddenness and the stupidity
level of change of a thetan who can create time and space,
and all of a sudden all he can do is hang on to a body and
obey orders and think of something once in a while.
Pathetic when you come to think about it. But it really
isn't pathetic at all. What are you doing falling for all
this stuff about pain? What do you want pain for? It's not
even useful. It's not useful to you, it's not useful to
anybody else. If you want to have destruction, why put in
pain? Because it's a strange thing that pain would be 1.8
- evidently not 1.81 or 1.82 or 1.73 on the Tone Scale;
it's 1.8. And it is composed of hotness, coldness and an
electrical current. See, that's the anatomy and location of
pain, and it is caused by an excess of randomity which is
at a certain wave level. Pain isn't a helter-skelter
hit-or-miss, just an impact. Pain is a very, very precise
thing.
It's, oh, fascinating - a very precise thing. 1.8 on the
Tone Scale. And it's caused by just so much. Because, you
see, if you give the guy just a little bit more randomity
than that, he doesn't feel pain - he's gone right now.
He's just gone.
And that's another thing, is how does your preclear ever
get the idea that he can be gone? How can you have a
goneness out of a unit which can do time and space and
energy and matter, and all sorts of things? How do you get
a goneness? How can he be gone? There isn't any place to
which he could "went." Or how can he be unconscious? He's
capable of inventing consciousness.
What's he doing going unconscious? Well, all the answers to
these questions are right there in - possibly in
agreement: If you'll feel pain, I'll feel pain.
Only I never agreed with anybody to feel pain.
Now, he deals with and experiences best illusions of his
own. That's his highest level of knowingness. Next best, he
experiences reality, and next best to that experiences
delusion. That's your gradient scale of knowingness. If
they ever added up, they would be "know illusion," and then
junior to that would be "know MEST, and junior to that
would be "know delusion." You could probably get a lot of
ideas out of delusion, but it's unimportant.
Now, all these things are, to some tiny or vague degree
here in the MEST universe, energy. And they locate and are
in time and space. But I won't say whose time and space. A
delusion is somebody pushing his illusion into your time
and space - if you want to define it that way.
All right. Enough discussion on this. We have, then, a plot
of a track which will pretty well work out on an E-Meter
with your preclear. And if you want to look over the track
and the E-Meter and the preclear, you'll find out that he
has some kind of a history like I just described to you -
home universe, he calls it.
There's separation from theta, you get a bop - home
universe - or you get a little rise and everything was
very fine. And then all of a sudden, there was the MEST
universe - the home universe was gone. And you'll get him
thinking, "Oh, my, my. I wonder if I - I wish I... wish I
knew what the secret of the MEST universe was." There isn't
any secret to the MEST universe: that was its secret. The
secret of the MEST universe is you can create a MEST
universe any time you want to. But if you held on to and
tried to grab hold of and stop the encroachment of the MEST
universe, not just change your wavelength - if it happened
in your time-space suddenly enough - you're here. And if
you let it go on by and to hell with it and just shifted
over in another time span, you've got your own universe
someplace else and you're not here. The essence, the very
essence of simplicity.
Those are two classifications: there's them that's here and
them that's not here. And them that's not here we're not
going to worry about, because the funny part of them that's
not here, they're probably having a perfectly happy time
someplace else in time, space, and maybe a time-space unit
which runs diagonally across this room, by the way. I mean,
you see, it has no bearing - time relationships, space
relationships.
There is no space or time beyond the space or time
necessary to hold the energy which you create. But if you
have the ener --. You get the idea.
What's so baffling about it, and the only thing that's
really baffling about it, is you can create the whole kit
and caboodle out of your thin... out of thin nothing. You
can create the whole thing - there you are, there is no
secret. That would be the hardest thing that you could ever
convince anybody, but that's a typical MEST universe fact.
There's no secret. What's the secret of the MEST universe?
That there's no secret, of course! That would be right
there in the groove with the MEST universe, that would be
the MEST universe's best trick. It makes the obvious and
hides it, because it's a crude, relatively unworkable,
solid, rather onerous sort of a dopehead's dream, who
wasn't too bright.
And if it's the inevitable average, brother, I don't think
much of some of the other universes that collided to make
this one. Because it's dopey, this one. It's not a bright
universe.
Its total value - evaluation is force. It's all down on the
force band. And that's silly! Because something that's on
the force band won't work! The one thing that won't work is
force! Under no circumstances has force ever worked! An
idea any day of the week can lick the pants off of force.
[tape LS-1, OT cassette #11 ends here abruptly]
------------------------ start of LS-3
[The remainder of the lecture as delivered in SofMU and
R&D 12 is side 1 of lecture LS-3 "Have as Homo Sapiens and as
Thetans, Clearing by Communication, Have" which is OT
Cassette #13 supposedly given on 7 Nov 52 rather than
on 6 Nov 52 which is the date of the above lecture]
All these great, flaming suns, all these huge, inimitable
expanses, all these tremendously, tremendously cold and
inhospitable spaces, all these dead planets and dead stars,
could be reduced to a pile of utter nothingness of rubble
by an idea.
You don't believe it? Well, you don't believe it. And the
only thing I can ask you to do is make a clinical
experiment on it. Try it. Try it in a small, little sphere
- a little sphere of action. Take somebody you know who
believes in tremendous force and think of the insignificant
idea which would defeat him utterly.
You actually have to be able and willing to handle force.
But how do you handle force? With force? No! You can't
handle force with force because that gives you ridges and
more force. You see how that is? You can't handle force
with force. It isn't that force begets force, or he who
dies by the sword lives by the Bible, or anything. I mean,
whatever it is... I'm not scrambling that up on purpose,
really. That was just a slip of the Testament! Here's...
And, by the way, it is, to a large extent, a book of force,
which is where it falls down. And the only time religion
has ever fallen down was when it believed it had a god of
force. A god of force can always be licked.
You can take the mightiest cyclotrons in the world that
exist today, and if you just get the proper idea they will
become dust. Force has to be handled, maybe, by force, but
the actual fact is that an idea alone can vanquish force.
If you just had .if you had a command and control over
space and time the way you should have, you could simply
pshew! onto another time track any force that ever came
near you.
Now, let's put this very practically - very practically:
The cat Tom is eating the little mouse... about to eat the
little mouse Jerry in the comic cartoon. And Tom is sitting
there and he's about to stuff Jerry into his mouth when all
of a sudden - Jerry is sitting on his hand - and Jerry
looks in this palm and then, and he won't let Tom see
what's in his hand. The big, stupid cat says, "What you
got?" And Jerry says, "Pshew!" and is gone.
Yeah, what you got? It doesn't take any idea at all... The
only reason why you ever have trouble - if you ever do
have trouble - defeating force is because you just don't
think of the idea, and usually because you overreach with
your idea. You haven't any concept of how simple the idea
has to be! You want to get complicated because you know
it's lots of force, so you think you want to have lots of
idea.
This is not order of magnitude; they don't follow the same
order of magnitude. Actually, they go quite in reverse.
They go quite in reverse: is the more force there is, the
less idea it takes to handle that force. Because an idea is
awful powerful. And you can get an idea so powerful that
it'll just shoot above, around and over and through this
mass and this force, and it just never hits it.
So remember that in processing a preclear. Your idea can be
way, way, way too good to defeat this thing which is
practically... which is nothing to handle this force. All
you are trying to get him to do is handle force, create and
destroy force, which includes create and destroy matter,
energy, space and time.
Well, now, if you try to use these big, complex ideas, and
you erect these treadmills, and then you have to have the
weathercock so the weather is in the northwest section, and
then you've got to have this and you've got to have that,
and you do this and you do that, and something or other,
and then you make long lists of this, and then you have him
running around the living room, and then we'll put up a
wire cage around him while he's processing so none of his
force escapes or something, so no other force can hit him
and...
Thha. All you had to say with him is just, "Step a foot
back of your head." That was all the idea it took.
All of a sudden he gets a new idea. You want to know what
happens? He doesn't change in location in time and space.
He just gets a new idea and he's the idea! He has that
capability. You're not transferring a thing. And that's the
first mistake you can make, is thinking that you are
transferring and handling a thing. You're not. It's not an
object made out of force and matter.
You're handling something which is so much more powerful
than the atom bomb and so much more changeable than a
woman's mind that there's just no comparison. You're
handling this thing of terrific capability and it handles
so easy. And all you're asking it to do is to do the
easiest thing there is to do - that's handle force.
Now, if you don't believe force is easy to handle, you
say... Think of it this way: You've got to space the force
in terms of time. If you try to handle a force in too short
a space of time by a force, it'll really finish you.
Here's a guy with a rifle. All right. He walks up, he's
going to shoot you with a rifle. Well, you've waited until
he's walked up to you. And what are you doing with a body,
anyhow? Well, the thing to do as he walks up to you with a
rifle - all you have to do is whisper in his ear, "The
breech will explode." He won't pull the trigger. He gets
the sudden idea the breech is going to explode.
What are you doing with a body, anyhow? You get a body, you
see, and you have a good time with this body, and you say,
"Well, it takes a body to handle force." Yes, it takes a
body to stop force. That's perfectly true, and it's a lousy
idea. It's a terrible idea, actually. Why aren't you in the
kind of a state that all you have to do is mock up a body
which everybody can see and know is there? That's all.
And somebody comes up with force and they say, "We're going
to destroy your body!" That's shorthand for "We're going to
arrest you," or "We're going to hit you," or "We're going
to use force on you," "We're going to take time and space
away from you; going to impose time and space on you,"
something of the sort like this.
And they reach out and they say, "Come along with..."
There's nothing there.
You can stand there and say, "What's the matter wit' ya,
bud?" Because that's really the first and only mistake you
ever made on the time track is you tried to stop force with
force. And the second you tried to stop force with force,
it left you in a condition of being handled by force from
there on. And right now you think it takes force to handle
force. There isn't any reason why you couldn't wish that up
in the air instead of having to toss it up in the air. Just
wish it up in the air and have it hang there. There isn't
any reason why you can't do this.
But don't tell me that you're going to do this while you're
still in a body, you still have to have a body, you still
have to have for yourself this rare and fantastic privilege
of being... Well, they permitted you to feed a body and
work a body and earn a living for the body, and so on, on
the theory' that you have to have a body.
All right. Let's take the theory "You have to have a body,"
and what comes out of it instantly? "All right. I'll have a
body." It doesn't have to be a force body, though.
Your thirst for making things automatic, of setting up
ridges that would operate ridges so you wouldn't have to
concentrate on them at all or give them new ideas all the
time, brought you into a condition of a reliance upon the
body.
You say, "The body can handle force. I can't handle force."
That's the same statement. When you say, "Joe will always
dig the ditch and Bill will always fill out the forms,"
you're saying at the same time, whether you realize it or
not, "I need to have the ditch dug by a force body, and the
force body which I'll use to do this is Joe. And the forms
that'll be filled out will be done by... they have to be
filled out by a force body." Why don't you just dream up
the form, huh? You dream up a filled-up form. Somebody asks
you to make out a form. What the hell would you be doing
making out forms if you didn't have a body? It would just
be a body that'd - you know, ration books, petrol books,
this book, that book; you wouldn't need those.
All right. Let's take money: Now, there isn't any reason
why you can't think up a ten-pound note and hand it to the
fellow and have it go on into circulation for the next ten
years. There's no reason why you can't do this.
What do you want a money for, huh? You say, "It's nice to
have." That means MEST is nice to have. Great! You've
confessed right at that moment you can't invent MEST.
You've said, "I can't create MEST. I have to acquire it or
steal it. I have to go through this legal tender
proposition in order to acquire some other MEST somebody
else has got." Interesting, isn't it?
When you get into the field of force, we get into the field
of complete inability - just utter, degrading inability.
And that's something that you've got to cure with your
preclear. What's all this inability?
I had a fellow one time, invented the term abstricts. I was
talking to him for three days, a year or two ago, about
"The only thing that you have ever been granted is an
inhibition. The only present which has ever been made to
you is an inhibition - the ability not to do something.
That's the only thing anybody ever gave you, is the ability
not to do. Nobody ever gave you the ability to do." The
ability not to do. Because notice, most of the time when
somebody gives you the ability to do, they have to tell
you, you can't do it first; then they proceed to teach you.
All right. The ability not to do becomes very interesting.
And he formed it up and he began to listen to people when
they talked. And they said, "You can't do this and you
can't do that." Nearly everything they said to him out in
this human society was "You can't do it. You mustn't do it.
There is a barrier there. There's a barrier here." And he'd
listen to this.
And that's a good drill for you, by the way. Open up your
ears for the next day or so and just listen to Homo sapiens
talking, and you'll find out that he's telling you "There's
a barrier in time. There's a barrier in space.
You can't move here. You can't move there. You can't do
this. You can't do that." He's a walking mass of "can't,"
because that's all he was ever given was "can't." Because
nobody could give him "can." He could! He could already,
you see? Horrible joke, isn't it?
Well, this young fellow invented the word abstrict, and
that meant "restrictions..." - oh, "the abstraction of
restriction." An abstraction of restriction was a method of
creating space and time. And you're right, you see?
I mean, that's very correct. And if you create space and
time you have this condition. All right. Abstricts.
You listen to Homo sapiens the next day or so. He's saying,
"You can't do this, and I can't do that, and you can't do
this, and we can't do that, and this is impossible, and
that is unobtainable, and this cannot be reached," and
that's all he talks about. If he ever says "can," he says,
"Well, we can do it if we are allowed." He always adds in
that he has to be permitted. This fellow got this concept,
by the way... And if you don't think this is a powerful
concept, listen to what happened to him.
He was in love with a girl. He went over, he taught her the
principle.
She'd not been happy with her husband and she had a little
baby. He went over and taught this to this girl, and they
turned around and they told the husband to go fly a kite.
And they went up the pole, so to speak, both of them.
And you say, "Well, nothing good could have come of this.
Nothing good could have come of it." But he promptly got a
job for about twelve hundred dollars a month as a
mathematician. He'd never quite been able to make the grade
before. And he got a job with one of the big aviation
companies because he solved two of the most imponderable
imponderables in the field of aviation, one after the
other, and took it down one morning and threw it on the
desk of the works manager and said, "There is a solution to
this, there is a solution to that. And I want a job because
I keep turning things out like this all the time." And they
gave him a job. And he got the kind of a job so he never
has to report to work.
That's an abstrict. And it is very powerful.
If you want to send your preclear up the pole fast, you
just convince him that there is no limit and there is no
barrier. Now, he's liable not... You see, if you've got the
knowledge of what limits and barriers there have been and
then you get this other concept, you're perfectly safe. You
just move on out of it. But if you get this concept that
there are no barriers, and you all of a sudden vaguely
understand the concept or something clicks on the subject
and you have no understanding of it, there's no track, you
don't know the composition of the MEST universe or an
illusion or anything else, you just simply soar - boom!
And then six months later, people are picking up the pieces.
Fascinating the limitations, limitations.
For instance, Kipling's great poem "If" tells you what to
do, and every line of it is an inhibition. It infers that
this isn't natural. It infers that this is just horrendous,
this is magniloquent. If you were this way that would be
terrific, and usually you can't quite obtain that, but
there it is and this is the big goal. And he makes this big
hurrah, hurrah, crunch! I like his poetry a lot, but he
does this hurrah on this "If." And I notice that the
lousiest poem he ever did, really, was "If" because it
says, "Look, look-a-here, if you could do all these things,
if you could do all these things," and so on, and he paints
this little tiny molehill, see? Here's this little tiny
molehill, and he says, "Boy, if you could climb that, you'd
really be a man, my son." And the guy said, "God, I must be
low. Gee, look where I must be, if to climb this molehill
makes me up high." You get the idea? That's the sort of
backwards computation you run into consistently.
Now, all of these things - all of these things are
actually the gilt around Standard Operating Procedure.
What's an engram? Boom with force. What's it do? It makes
the guy meet it with force. How do you solve it? You stop
the guy from meeting it with force. It's awful simple,
isn't it?
And force is energy, space and time. So there are eighty
ways you could go about solving it. And one of the ways you
can go about solving it is just keep removing him from him
as a body until he's outside of his own force zone. And of
course he'll get well in an awful hurry. All you have to do
is get him outside of his own force zone and then he can
sit there and figure this out. Because what chance has he
got to figure it out if he keeps getting hit by forces all
around him and through him and in him and everything else?
He doesn't have much of a chance.
Now, if he'd just go sit quietly on a pink cloud someplace
- invent a pink cloud in some other time strata and sit
quietly on it for a little while - he would be able to
dope out from what he knows here the rest of it. He'd be
able to rehabilitate his ability to do this and his ability
to do that, and so forth.
That would be a very ideal way to go about it: just have a
very full education on it, and then get booted out and put
into fairly good shape somehow or other, and then dream
yourself up a pink cloud and sit on it. And that would be
- let the MEST universe go to hell for a little while. And
you'd turn up with the answers that you needed to make
yourself able to operate in the MEST universe.
Now, you wonder why anybody would operate in the MEST
universe. Well, I'll tell you why they'll operate in the
MEST universe: it's randomity. You read in the Axioms and
you find randomity. That's right. The MEST universe is a
mighty big target. If you could eat up the MEST universe,
depopulate it and square it around, you'd always be able to
sit down, take the facsimile of having done something to
the MEST universe and give it to somebody you invented to
play football with. It's randomity, action.
Unfortunate - most people don't think there's enough value
in randomity to do anything for the sake of randomity, but
they're low Tone Scale. You get... Almost anybody will do
something for the sake of randomity when you get them up
the Tone Scale a little bit. It should have a project and a
goal and an end and square it around.
So you just take off a nice big project someplace or other
and say, "I think I will..." It doesn't matter what you
say. You can get interested in it and everything else. You
don't have to say, "I think I will destroy the MEST
universe." You could also say, "I think I will build this
big universe that has nothing but force in it and see how
well it gets along, and then one day I'll cashier the whole
works. And I think I'll take off two months of my spacetime
for the project. And let's see, how long is two months of
my space-time?
Well, that will be a hundred billion years of the universe
time which I'm going to create." It's all satisfactory.
That's perfectly satisfactory reasoning. And go ahead and
do it.
Or you could say right here on Earth, "I think I'll clean
up all the vinegar works in England. The trouble with
vinegar works is they need cleaning up." And that's just
what you do. Then you decide you'll get a little society
together and you clean up vinegar works.
The whole trouble is that when people do this they don't
realize that they are dealing with a very elementary
principle: that is, it's just randomity.
They want action, they want motion, so they have to have a
stage and scene for motion. Anything serves as motion, just
anything. You could postulate some kind of a motion that is
going forward and create the motion, and then do something
about it.
And how often do you find somebody doing something about
that? You'll find people running all over the place,
particularly in politics, inventing the most astonishing
and horrible atrocities, just so they can do something
about them. And I wouldn't put it past some of these people
in politics to do these astonishing and horrible atrocities
and get them finished up just so they can go in and do
something about it.
As a matter of fact, Japan used to do that. The Japanese
used to create the incident so they could create the war.
Did it constantly. They would go out - they'd send a
couple of secret-service boys out and have a couple of
their own troops shot and then have the government where
the troops were, apologizing. And if the government didn't
apologize, then they could go in with troops. But they'd
really kill the troops - anything to create randomity.
Now, Standard Operating Procedure for Theta Clearing, here,
is self explanatory. The only things that I would call your
attention to with regard to it is that if you ask the
preclear to "be" rather than "move," you probably will get
further. That just skidded by in the dictation of this. And
it's something that should be punched up. If you have a
copy there you're going to use, make a notation on it.
Should be "Ask the preclear to be a foot back of his head."
And then, "If he is..." But the only reason why you've got
directional areas there - the only reason you've got
directions - is just so that he gets something to be in
relation toward. He wants to be in relationship to
something like dimension and time.
Now, when it comes to this negative step, it doesn't have
the workability which it might have, but will occasionally
work.
When you speak of orientation, by the time you've got to
Step III, it is "move," because you've got somebody so
bogged down by force he will use force, and it'd be a very
high level to have him use force in time and space. That
wouldn't be true of a Step I, so we have a further
differentiation on a Step I.
Let's look over here at Step IV, Ridge Running. I'll make
you a bet: I don't believe any of you have used Ridge
Running worth a nickel. Why not?
I'll bet you two or three of the cases that you're having
trouble with that I have heard of vaguely, here and there,
will resolve by Ridge Running. You haven't used it.
Female voice: I said it yesterday. I would like to meet the
IV because I've never met one.
Oh, have you met a V?
Female voice: Yes.
Have you processed a V?
Female voice: Yes.
And he won't do a IV.
Female voice: Well, he does a I now.
Well, what'd you do, hit V and then go DED-DEDEX and then boom?
Female voice: Tried IV. Did I, II, III, IV in a normal
manner before I arrived at V.
And he didn't do IV?
Female voice: And he didn't do IV.
You haven't met a IV, huh? Well, I've met two or three IVs
that I don't think would have solved easily on anything
else. These guys had to know something was happening before
it could even vaguely happen.
Now, here we have orientation in the theta universe...
pardon me, in the MEST universe. Shorthanding what I'm
saying here - orientation in the theta universe. And I'd
like to add to this, why don't you orient him in his own
universe, huh? How about thinking about that? That occur to
you?
Female voice: No.
All the way down the line when it says "orientation,"
remember that it can mean "orient him in the MEST universe"
or "orient him in his own universe." And they'd be two
different processes. You'd have him invent some time and
then some space and then orient himself in it. And the
possibility is that this would be a superior technique to
orienting him in the MEST universe. I haven't tried it. I
just look it over and I say, "Well, there's a technique
sitting there - orient him in his own universe." You might
have him going right back to his own universe. Because, you
see, his universe isn't located in space in relationship to
MEST space; it's just elsewhere in that it is not here.
Because here means this space, it does not mean a time
difference.
All right. You might do a lot by just asking a fellow to
describe to you what kind of a universe he had up to the
time it blew up, or whether it blew up. What happened to
it? You might say, "What kind of a universe was it?" And
just keep... He keeps describing what kind of a universe it
was, and, "Orient yourself this way" and, "Orient yourself
that way in it," and, "Describe it some more," and that
might be the fastest technique which we have.
As I say, I haven't tested it.
You're liable to find all sorts of weird things. You're
liable to find some preclear of yours that can't get color,
had never heard of color till he hit the MEST universe, and
he hasn't seen it since. I mean, it's just a concept that
he never got as his own idea. It wasn't part of his home
universe or anything like it. And you might recover to him
all of his skills just by doing that. Interesting thought.
Now, with regard to the general material which is here, we
have an organization, really, which you have been using for
some little time. You might give me a comment. You might
give me a comment. Have you found this working with your
preclears?
Audience: Yes. Yes. It does work.
Yes, it's working.
Male voice: It does, yes.
Where have you found it falling down? Has it fallen down anyplace?
Male voice: Yes, the only place I find that it's got any,
any falling - down is in the fact that the preclears
themselves, in lack of confidence in what you're doing with
them.
Got a lack of confidence in you?
Male voice: A lack of confidence in the particular thing
that is being done.
Female voice: They are very MEST bound, you know? "Theta
Clearing - what's it mean?" Well, you know. "Am I liable to
be able to have nine thousand pounds a year and a
large-sized car and two wives if I want to, as a Theta
Clears Wouldn't it be much better to be a MEST Clear?" That
sort of...
Male voice: You use mock-up, you see, and the person says,
"Hm, that's fine. But I'm not sure that this will make me
well! Are you sure?"
Okay, I have an answer for that. Audit outside of your
body. Now, that's the best remedy I know for that, offhand,
is audit outside of your body and make the sound and
auditing commands emanate from out of your body, and
don't have a body at all while you're auditing. Oh, I
think you'd get results.
Male voice: The auditor has to do that, now?
Well, I'm... You asked me; you've made the statement.
That's very, very fatal, by the way, to pose me a problem.
I most always have a solution, because there aren't very
many serious problems in the MEST universe. It's kind of a
silly universe. It's a universe everybody's been working so
hard to solve because it didn't have anything to solve in it.
All right. What business have you got sitting there in a
body auditing anybody anyhow? Let's be tough about this.
Come on, what's the idea? What's the idea?
Female voice: Even if you don't, the preclear still
identifies you with your body.
Oh, it's not important. This is not important. This is not
important. If you had... your sound of your voice was
rolling out a thing, and he identified you... I tell you,
once upon a time we did do this: We made a picture of an
angel and made it talk to a psychotic. The psychotic was so
upset about people that I said, "Well, let's audit him
without a person!" How simple. We did. He got well. He got
well very fast.
So this is a big thought, you see. I mean, you could say,
"Now, you'd really be much better off without a body. Look
at me." The fellow says, "Where?" And you say, "Well, right
here." And put a doll there or something, you see? And make
the doll's jaw move or something, so he feels like the talk
is coming from there.
And you say, "Now, pick up the doll and see if there are
any wires connected to it. Now look in the back of the doll
and see if there's any radio connections with it. That's
right. Now put me back down on the desk here.
That's right. Put me down in the little doll's chair.
That's fine. That's fine.
All right. Now how about you being a foot back of your
head?" Of course, you could say at the same time, and just
as fast as that, "Every night before you go to bed,
hereafter, you will say your prayers and you will remember
- remember to say your prayers to Bill Spinbin, HDA, and
remember that he is God." You'd do that too. And you... if
you went at this wide a disagreement with the MEST universe,
that's obviously what you are, that's all.
Well, I've given you a solution to overcome this objection.
I don't see why you don't find it a satisfactory solution.
Here I'm sitting here talking to you without a body.
[SofMU says - Please note: This lecture ends abruptly as did
the original master recording.]
[The cassette continues on briefly beyond this point]
> female voice: We know that because we don't identify you with
> your body, but a difficult preclear always identifies
> you with your body and for the other preclear it doesn't make
> any different, he could be outside. Their not easy and they
> can't see any difference if your in your body, outside your
> body, ...
>
> Well what are you doing filling up the universe and letting
> go make their own universe a bunch of mean, onery,
> cantankerous preclears?
[here it really does end]
Online auditing in any place on the planet https://timecops.net/english.html